Efficacy of the ADEC in Identifying Autism Spectrum Disorder in Clinically Referred Toddlers in the US.
ADEC spots 93-94 % of ASD cases in referred toddlers in just 10 minutes of play.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tested a 10-minute play-based screen called ADEC. They gave it to toddlers who were already sent to a clinic for developmental concerns.
They wanted to know if ADEC could spot autism as well as longer tests do.
What they found
ADEC caught 93-94 out of every 100 toddlers who truly had ASD. It rarely missed a case, so you can feel safe when it says “yes.”
The trade-off: it also flags some kids who do not have ASD, so always follow up with a full assessment.
How this fits with other research
Toh et al. (2018) looked at M-CHAT in similar clinic toddlers and found it missed many ASD cases. ADEC’s 93-94 % hit rate makes it the stronger first pass.
Lancioni et al. (2006) showed that the long ADI-R interview often fails with toddlers because they have not yet shown repetitive play. ADEC sidesteps that problem by watching play directly, so it keeps its high sensitivity.
Allison et al. (2008) found the parent-filled Q-CHAT also works well. ADEC gives you a second path: if parents struggle with forms, you can still screen accurately by play.
Why it matters
You now have a 10-minute tool that catches almost every ASD case in referred toddlers. Use ADEC while the family is still in the waiting room. If it flags the child, move straight to ADOS and schedule intervention. The brief time cost means fewer kids slip through the cracks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Keep ADEC forms and a small toy set handy; run the screen on your next 18- to 36-month referral and immediately forward positives for full assessment.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The Autism Detection in Early Childhood (ADEC) is a brief, play-based screening tool for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children aged 12-36 months. We examined the psychometric properties of the ADEC in a clinical sample of toddlers (n = 114) referred to a US pediatric hospital for assessment due to concerns of developmental delay or ASD. The ADEC (cutoff = 11) returned good sensitivity (.93-.94) but poorer specificity (.62-.64) for best estimate clinical diagnosis of ASD, and compared favorably with the ADOS-2. Internal consistency was acceptable, α = .80, and inter-rater reliability was high, ICC = .95. Results support the use of the ADEC as a clinical screen for ASD.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015 · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2398-5