Assessment & Research

Do students with Down syndrome have a specific learning profile for reading?

Ratz (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

Down syndrome readers shine at letter-sound work then stall—so teach in syllable-sized bites to sidestep their verbal memory ceiling.

✓ Read this if BCBAs or teachers writing reading programs for school-age students with Down syndrome.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on preschool language or on populations without Down syndrome.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Ratz (2013) looked at reading skills in 190 students with Down syndrome. Ages ranged from 6 to 20.

Each child was placed in one of four reading stages. The team then compared the Down syndrome group to 1,419 peers with other intellectual disabilities.

02

What they found

The Down syndrome group showed a clear signature. They peaked at the alphabetic level—sounding out letters and simple syllables.

Progress slowed once texts demanded bigger verbal memory loads. This pattern differed from the wider ID group, whose skills were more even across stages.

03

How this fits with other research

Bhaumik et al. (2009) first mapped the verbal short-term memory weakness in Down syndrome. Christoph links that same weakness to the reading-stage dip seen after the alphabetic level.

Laugeson et al. (2014) later showed preschoolers with Down syndrome already score low on working-memory and planning tasks. Together the three papers trace a line: early memory limits → later reading blocks.

Schertz et al. (2016) found these kids also struggle to recall the correct order of actions. The matching trouble with letter order in longer words may explain why syllable-based methods work better than whole-word drills.

04

Why it matters

If you teach reading to students with Down syndrome, start strong with letter-sound work but plan an early switch to syllable chunks. Keep verbal memory demand low: use short lines, visual cues, and repeated patterns. Drop heavy phonics sequences that ask kids to hold five sounds at once; break them into two. This small shift can keep the alphabetic advantage alive and push them into fuller texts.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Cut your next word list into two-syllable chunks and present each chunk with a matching picture.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
190
Population
down syndrome, intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The present study assessed achieved reading stages of 190 school-aged children with Down syndrome (DS, age 6-20) in Bavaria, one of the most populated federal states in Germany. Teachers described the reading stages of their students in a questionnaire. The achieved stages of reading according to the developmental model of Frith are compared to a sample of 1419 students with intellectual disability (ID) regardless of etiology, but excluding DS; thereafter parallelized ID-groups were compared. Results of the questionnaire addressed to the students' teachers showed that 20.2% of the students with DS do not read at all, 7.6% read at a logographic stage, 49.4% at an alphabetic and 22.8% at an orthographic level. Alongside these findings among the whole sample, correlations are described concerning age, gender, IQ and sociocultural background. The students with DS are then compared to other students with ID with mixed etiologies. This comparison stresses the emphasis on the alphabetic level amongst students with DS. This emphasis also exists when DS and non-DS students are parallelized in groups of ID, thus showing that students with DS and severe ID are ahead in reading, but those with mild ID are behind. Knowledge about specific literacy attainment of students with DS is vital for planning instruction, for creating learning environments, and for formulating future fields of research. Especially students with DS need specific teaching which takes their impaired verbal short term memory into account, such as learning to read in syllables.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.031