Distinctive patterns of Multiple Object-Tracking performance trajectories in youth with deficits in attention, learning, and intelligence.
A quick dot-tracking game can separate global delay from specific attention or learning problems by looking at start point versus learning speed.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Tullo et al. (2023) watched kids play a video game that makes you track several moving dots at once. They tested three groups: children with intellectual disability, ADHD, or specific learning disorder.
The team ran the same game many times in one sitting. They counted how many dots each child could follow at the start and how fast each child improved.
What they found
Kids with intellectual disability began at a lower dot-tracking level. Their starting scores were below the other groups.
Kids with ADHD or learning disorder started higher but learned more slowly. Their scores rose in a flatter line across trials.
How this fits with other research
Efstratopoulou et al. (2012) used PE teachers' checklists to spot motor signs that split ADHD from autism. The new MOT task gives a computer-based update: it still separates the groups, but with precise eye-tracking data instead of playground notes.
Kaya et al. (2025) found the Stroop color test can flag learning disorder inside an ADHD sample. Domenico's dot game adds a second quick tool; Stroop catches verbal slowing while MOT catches visual attention slowing.
Riches et al. (2016) pooled TMS brain studies and showed ADHD brains have weaker motor inhibition. The flat MOT learning curve in Domenico's ADHD group matches that idea: weaker inhibition may stall practice gains.
Why it matters
If a child struggles in class, a five-minute MOT test can tell you where to look. Low first-trial scores point toward global cognitive delay; normal start but slow climb points toward ADHD or learning issues. You get a data-based hint before the full evaluation is done.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a free MOT demo on your clinic tablet, record baseline trials, and watch if the child's score climbs or stays flat across five repeats.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
There is a significant overlap in symptomology between individuals with deficits in attention and learning, which is explained by the co-dependent dynamic between the two cognitive constructs. Within this dynamic, attentional resources are allocated to salient stimuli while learning mechanisms distinguish relevant from irrelevant information. Moreover, individuals with deficits in higher-order cognition (i.e., intelligence) can demonstrate difficulties in attention and learning. The Multiple Object-Tracking (MOT) task is a sensitive and versatile measure of attention that has characterized individual differences in attention as a function of higher-order cognition. Exploiting the traditional MOT task's ability to characterize the allocation of attentional resources to task demands, the current study compared learning exhibited on an attention-based task across neurodevelopmental conditions defined by deficits in attention (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ADHD), learning (specific learning disorder; SLD), and intelligence (intellectual developmental disorder; IDD). Children and adolescents (N = 101) completed 15 sessions on a Multiple Object-Tracking (MOT) task where performance trajectories were analyzed using latent growth curve modeling and conditioned by the presence of ADHD, SLD, or IDD while controlling for performance on a separate measure of attention, age, and sex. The sample, characterized by below-average IQ and problematic levels of attention, exhibited an effect of learning on MOT. However, individuals with an IDD diagnosis demonstrated decreased baseline MOT capability while ADHD and SLD profiles exhibited decreased slopes, relative to other neurodevelopmental conditions. Taken together, the results demonstrate distinct linear performance trajectories between neurodevelopmental conditions defined by deficits in attention, learning, and intelligence. The current study provides additional evidence to repurpose the traditional MOT task as a descriptor of attention and discusses alternative uses for the paradigm. Overall, these results suggest an eclectic approach that considers attention, learning, and higher-order cognition when diagnosing ADHD, SLD, or IDD.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2023 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104402