Assessment & Research

Disentangling Neural Sources of the Motor Interference Effect in High Functioning Autism: An EEG-Study.

Deschrijver et al. (2017) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2017
★ The Verdict

Motor-planning, not self-other confusion, drives imitation problems in high-functioning autism.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running social-skills groups with verbal teens or adults who struggle to imitate.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working with non-verbal or minimally verbal clients under age five.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team wired 24 high-functioning adults with autism to EEG caps.

They watched the adults copy simple hand moves while the machine tracked brain waves.

The goal was to see which step in the chain—planning the move or telling self from other—breaks down in autism.

02

What they found

The big surprise: the brain wave that marks "this is my move, not yours" looked normal.

But the early readiness wave that fires just before a move was weak and late.

So the adults knew whose hand was whose, yet their brains still struggled to start the action.

03

How this fits with other research

Osório et al. (2025) extends the story to toddlers. They found the same motor-planning glitch shows up as wobbly, uneven steps in 18-month-olds with autism.

Deserno et al. (2017) used motion capture to show that kids with Developmental Coordination Disorder also have uneven steps. The methods differ—EEG versus cameras—but both point to motor-planning as the weak link.

Stewart et al. (2018) looked at Rett syndrome and found foot-pressure asymmetry predicts who can walk. Again, asymmetry in motor control links to real-life mobility, matching the EEG asymmetry seen here.

04

Why it matters

If imitation fails because the brain cannot start the move, not because the person confuses self with other, then our drills should target motor initiation. Try giving a clear "ready, go" cue or a brief countdown before each model to boost that readiness wave.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a two-second countdown before every modeled action to give the client’s motor system time to fire.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

The role of imitation in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is controversial. Researchers have argued that deficient control of self- and other-related motor representations (self-other distinction) might explain imitation difficulties. In a recent EEG study, we showed that control of imitation relies on high-level as well as on low-level cognitive processes. Here, we aimed to further our insights into control of imitation deficits in ASD. We focused on congruency effects in the P3 (high-level), the N190 and the readiness potential (RP; low-level). We predicted smaller congruency effects within the P3 in the ASD group. However, we found differences in the RP and not in the P3-component. Thus, high-level self-other distinction centred on motor actions may be preserved in ASD, while impairments are reflected during motor preparation.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017 · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2991-2