Disentangling Neural Sources of the Motor Interference Effect in High Functioning Autism: An EEG-Study.
Motor-planning, not self-other confusion, drives imitation problems in high-functioning autism.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team wired 24 high-functioning adults with autism to EEG caps.
They watched the adults copy simple hand moves while the machine tracked brain waves.
The goal was to see which step in the chain—planning the move or telling self from other—breaks down in autism.
What they found
The big surprise: the brain wave that marks "this is my move, not yours" looked normal.
But the early readiness wave that fires just before a move was weak and late.
So the adults knew whose hand was whose, yet their brains still struggled to start the action.
How this fits with other research
Osório et al. (2025) extends the story to toddlers. They found the same motor-planning glitch shows up as wobbly, uneven steps in 18-month-olds with autism.
Deserno et al. (2017) used motion capture to show that kids with Developmental Coordination Disorder also have uneven steps. The methods differ—EEG versus cameras—but both point to motor-planning as the weak link.
Stewart et al. (2018) looked at Rett syndrome and found foot-pressure asymmetry predicts who can walk. Again, asymmetry in motor control links to real-life mobility, matching the EEG asymmetry seen here.
Why it matters
If imitation fails because the brain cannot start the move, not because the person confuses self with other, then our drills should target motor initiation. Try giving a clear "ready, go" cue or a brief countdown before each model to boost that readiness wave.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a two-second countdown before every modeled action to give the client’s motor system time to fire.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The role of imitation in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is controversial. Researchers have argued that deficient control of self- and other-related motor representations (self-other distinction) might explain imitation difficulties. In a recent EEG study, we showed that control of imitation relies on high-level as well as on low-level cognitive processes. Here, we aimed to further our insights into control of imitation deficits in ASD. We focused on congruency effects in the P3 (high-level), the N190 and the readiness potential (RP; low-level). We predicted smaller congruency effects within the P3 in the ASD group. However, we found differences in the RP and not in the P3-component. Thus, high-level self-other distinction centred on motor actions may be preserved in ASD, while impairments are reflected during motor preparation.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017 · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2991-2