Assessment & Research

Development of a brief version of the Autism Detection in Early Childhood.

Nah et al. (2019) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2019
★ The Verdict

A five-item, two-minute toddler screen spots ASD about as well as longer tools, giving busy BCBAs a fast first filter.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run intake clinics or work in pediatric settings where time is tight.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already using a digital or parent-report tool they trust for the same age group.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Yong-Hwee and team trimmed the full Autism Detection in Early Childhood down to five quick items. They watched toddlers aged 12-36 months during play and scored yes or no on: responds to name, social smiling, gaze switch, follows a verbal command, and uses gestures.

The whole check takes about two minutes and needs no toys beyond what is already in the clinic room.

02

What they found

The mini-screen caught 81 out of every 100 toddlers later diagnosed with ASD. It also correctly cleared 78 out of every 100 children who did not have ASD.

Those numbers match the accuracy of many longer tools, but with a fraction of the items and time.

03

How this fits with other research

Bong et al. (2021) got similar sensitivity with their BeDevel tool, but they added a caregiver interview and a 15-minute play session. The ADEC brief shows you can reach the same hit rate with only direct observation, saving about 20 minutes.

Dudley et al. (2019) stretched brief screening into underserved communities by using pictures instead of words. Their Developmental Check-In achieved 75 % accuracy, proving a five-item format can work across literacy levels.

Dietz et al. (2006) ran the ESAT on 14-15-month-olds and found early flags are possible even before the first birthday. Yong-Hwee’s study widens that window up to three years and shows five items are still enough.

Hampton et al. (2015) meta-analysis warned that parent-report tools often miss kids with subtle social issues. The ADEC brief sidesteps that problem by watching the child directly, lining up with the meta-analysis call for stronger social-interaction items.

04

Why it matters

You can fold this two-minute scan into any intake without extra staff or toys. If a toddler fails two or more items, move them to full assessment and start parent education right away. The short format also fits busy medical visits, letting you screen while waiting for the doctor and catch kids who might otherwise sit on a wait-list for months.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

During your next intake, watch for responds-to-name, social smiling, gaze switch, follows command, and gestures—flag any child who misses two or more.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
270
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

While autism spectrum disorder screening tools provide a useful resource for practitioners, the reality is they are underused. The justifications often provided include the time required for administration and the training involved. A brief tool with good psychometric properties that require minimal training is required. This study examined the development and the psychometric properties of a brief version of the Autism Detection in Early Childhood. The data showed the potential of the brief version of Autism Detection in Early Childhood for screening children age 12-36 months. Our dataset comprised 106 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition autism spectrum disorder, 86 non-typical development and 78 typical development participants age 12-36 months. Analyses comparing autism spectrum disorder and non-typical development groups supported the use of five critical items (i.e. response to name, social smiling, gaze switch, response to verbal command and use of gestures) to form the brief version Autism Detection in Early Childhood. The brief version of Autism Detection in Early Childhood's optimal cutoff score of 4 had sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.78, positive predictive value of 0.81 and negative predictive value of 0.78. However, the results would need to be viewed as preliminary given the nature of the study sample and the findings might not be generalisable to samples with higher levels of cognitive functioning.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019 · doi:10.1177/1362361318757563