Assessment & Research

Development and psychometric assessment of a psychological well-being instrument for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.

van Herwaarden et al. (2022) · Research in developmental disabilities 2022
★ The Verdict

The SPWB-ID is the first psychometrically sound tool that lets you measure eudaimonic well-being in adults with mild or borderline ID in under ten minutes.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who serve adults with mild or borderline ID in day-hab, residential, or community settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with children or severe/profound ID.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

van Herwaarden et al. (2022) built a short well-being scale for adults with mild or borderline ID. They trimmed the long-form SPWB down to six subscales that still cover purpose, growth, relationships, environment, self-acceptance, and autonomy.

Participants answered the new SPWB-ID. The team then ran reliability and validity checks to see if scores held together and made sense.

02

What they found

The trimmed SPWB-ID showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Factor analysis supported the same six-factor structure found in the general population.

Validity evidence was positive: higher SPWB-ID scores linked to less stress and better quality of life, showing the tool captures real well-being, not just random answers.

03

How this fits with other research

Shearn et al. (1997) did similar work, but for stress instead of well-being. Their Lifestress Inventory also proved reliable in mild-ID adults, giving clinicians a matched pair: one scale for stress, one for well-being.

Schaaf et al. (2015) developed the PIMRA-II to track psychopathology in the same population. Using both PIMRA-II and SPWB-ID lets you screen for mental health problems and strengths in the same meeting.

McGeown et al. (2013) showed the WAIS-IV keeps its four-factor structure in adults with ID. Together these papers build a toolkit: IQ (WAIS-IV), stress (Lifestress), psychopathology (PIMRA-II), and now well-being (SPWB-ID) all validated for this group.

04

Why it matters

Most happiness scales are too hard or too long for adults with mild or borderline ID. The SPWB-ID gives you a ready-to-use six-subscale measure that takes ten minutes and yields scores you can trust. Use it during intake, annual reviews, or outcome tracking to show whether day-hab, job coaching, or therapy is actually improving clients’ lives.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add the 18-item SPWB-ID to your intake packet and score it alongside your usual mental-health screen.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Sample size
103
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring eudaimonic well-being is important to gain a complete picture of the well-being of individuals with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MID-BIF), but there is no measurement instrument available for this population coding for multiple dimensions of eudaimonic well-being. AIMS: The current study developed and piloted a new instrument coding for eudaimonic well-being in individuals with MID-BIF. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The instrument (SPWB-ID) was adapted from Ryff's scales of psychological well-being, including subscales addressing purpose in life, environmental mastery, positive relationships, self-acceptance, personal growth, and autonomy. Adaptations were based on the literature and interviews with people with MID-BIF and experts in the field. The SPWB-ID was piloted among 103 adults with MID-BIF. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The trimmed version of the SPWB-ID showed sufficient to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hypothesis testing for construct validity suggested the subscales of the SPWB-ID measured well-being, showing moderate to high correlations with quality of life, and differences in eudaimonic well-being between participants with and without clinically relevant depression scores. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The SPWB-ID reliably measures eudaimonic well-being in individuals with MID-BIF. This enables support providers to collect information on eudaimonic well-being, providing input for person-centred care and support for individuals with MID-BIF.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2022 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104151