Assessment & Research

Cognitive development and Down syndrome: age-related change on the Stanford-Binet test (fourth edition).

Couzens et al. (2011) · American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2011
★ The Verdict

Expect wide individual differences in cognitive growth in Down syndrome—plan assessments and instruction accordingly, especially for language-heavy tasks that plateau early.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing IEPs or adult day-program goals for clients with Down syndrome.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving ASD or ADHD populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Couzens et al. (2011) followed people with Down syndrome for many years. They gave the Stanford-Binet IQ test again and again to see which skills grow and which stall.

The team tracked four kinds of tasks: repeating sentences, solving picture puzzles, naming pictures, and answering why questions.

02

What they found

Every person had a different path. Some kids zoomed ahead; others stayed flat.

Sentence memory barely moved after age ten. Puzzle solving kept climbing into the twenties. Word and why tasks rose fast at first, then hit a low ceiling.

03

How this fits with other research

Channell et al. (2014) saw the same flat standard scores in teens, but raw puzzle scores still inched up. Their data echo Donna’s puzzle rise and sentence stall.

Sharp et al. (2010) found daily-living skills plateau around twelve. Donna’s language scores also plateau early. Together they map a double ceiling: thinking and living skills.

Alaimo et al. (2015) later showed that after thirty, adults use fewer adaptive skills, not worse skills. Donna ends at thirty, so T extends the story: the ceiling stays, then the floor shrinks.

04

Why it matters

Stop waiting for language-heavy scores to rise. Shift goals to practical puzzles and daily routines once words level off. Track raw counts, not IQ numbers, to show real gains parents can see.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one nonverbal puzzle task to the session and graph correct pieces placed, not standard scores.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
208
Population
down syndrome
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Growth models for subtests of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition ( R. L. Thorndike, E. P. Hagen, & J. M. Sattler, 1986a , 1986b ) were developed for individuals with Down syndrome. Models were based on the assessments of 208 individuals who participated in longitudinal and cross-sectional research between 1987 and 2004. Variation in performance among individuals was large and significant across all subtests except Memory for Sentences. Scores on the Memory for Sentences subtest remained low between ages 4 to 30 years. Greatest variation was found on the Pattern Analysis subtest, where scores continued to rise into adulthood. Turning points for scores on the Vocabulary and Comprehension subtests appeared premature relative to normative patterns of development. The authors discuss development at the subdomain level and analyze both individual and group trajectories.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-116.3.181