Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: a summary of 79 cases.
A quick outpatient functional check pinned down why 79 clients acted out, foreshadowing today’s fast FA routines.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team ran short functional assessments on 79 outpatients who showed problem behavior.
Each session lasted only a few minutes and tested if attention, escape, or items kept the behavior going.
They wrote down what they saw but did not try any treatment.
What they found
The records showed clear reasons for the behavior in most cases.
Attention and escape came up again and again, matching what later big reviews would find.
How this fits with other research
Matson et al. (2011) later looked at 173 studies and saw the same pattern: attention and escape top the list.
Weber et al. (2024) built on this early chart review with a larger sample and counted how often results were clear.
Cullinan et al. (2001) ran full analog FAs on aggression and got clean functions; Jones et al. (1992) shows the brief version can still point you to the same contingencies.
Why it matters
You can copy the brief model when time is short. Run five-minute attention, escape, and play probes, then move straight to treatment. The data line up with decades of longer FAs, so you keep your clinic day on track without losing accuracy.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Try a 5-minute attention test, a 5-minute escape test, and a 5-minute alone or play test before lunch—chart the highest response rate, that’s your lead function.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Previous investigators have analyzed the maintaining conditions for aberrant behaviors using brief functional assessment procedures. These assessment procedures have been used in one of our outpatient clinics, the Self-Injurious and Aggressive Behavior Service. This study presents a descriptive summary of the results from 79 cases during a 3-year period. The outcomes of the brief assessment were evaluated across three variables: (a) referring topography, (b) control over behavior as evaluated through brief multielement designs, and (c) the identified maintaining conditions for aberrant behavior. The limitations and future utility of brief functional assessments for identifying distinct maintaining contingencies are discussed.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-713