Assessment & Research

Autism by another name? Semantic and pragmatic impairments in children.

Brook et al. (1992) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1992
★ The Verdict

Think 'autism toolkit' when you see puzzling word use without clear ASD, because the two profiles likely share roots.

✓ Read this if BCBAs doing language assessments or writing pragmatic goals for school-age kids.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run early-intensity ASD programs and never see pure language-impairment cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Koegel et al. (1992) wrote a narrative review. They looked at kids who had trouble using words in the right way. The authors asked if these children really had a separate disorder or if they sat on the same spectrum as autism.

They pulled together clinic reports and earlier papers. No new kids were tested. The goal was to see if autism tools could also help assess semantic-pragmatic language problems.

02

What they found

The team argued that semantic-pragmatic language disorder and autism share core features. They said the two labels might describe the same underlying issue.

They urged clinicians to borrow autism checklists and teaching methods when working with children whose main struggle is odd or out-of-place language.

03

How this fits with other research

Kelley et al. (2006) later showed that even when kids lose their autism diagnosis, subtle pragmatic and semantic gaps remain. This real-world data supports the idea of shared traits.

Amore et al. (2011) went further and directly compared ASD and pragmatic language impairment groups. Communication and social severity, not repetitive behaviors, told the groups apart. Their numbers back the overlap claim.

Ploog et al. (2007) seems to disagree. They found autistic children could encode semantic information just fine on lab recall tasks. The clash is only surface-deep: O et al. tested memory for word lists, while L et al. talked about everyday social language use. Method difference, not true conflict.

Lampri et al. (2024) updated the story. Their review of three decades of work confirms that figurative language stays hard for most autistic learners. The field has moved from broad labels to pinpointing which pragmatic skills need help.

04

Why it matters

If a child sounds odd but does not clearly meet ASD criteria, try autism-style pragmatic assessments anyway. Use social communication checklists, role-play conversations, and Theory-of-Mind tasks. The shared-deficit view also justifies borrowing autism interventions such as visual supports, scripted exchanges, and explicit teaching of hidden social rules. Screen for lingering gaps even after a child no longer carries an autism label, because subtle semantic-pragmatic problems can still block friendships and classroom success.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a pragmatic language subscale from an autism inventory to your intake packet for any child referred for 'odd speech.'

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The literature on children with language disorders that are characterized by semantic and pragmatic impairments is reviewed and the conclusion is drawn that some of these conditions may stem from the same fundamental cognitive and interpersonal difficulties that are found in early childhood autism. A summary is presented of recent relevant research and theory in the field of autism and suggestions are offered on how these ideas might be applied to children showing semantic and pragmatic difficulties.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1992 · doi:10.1007/BF01046403