Assessment & Research

Assessment, behavioral treatment, and prevention of pica: clinical guidelines and recommendations for practitioners.

Williams et al. (2012) · Research in developmental disabilities 2012
★ The Verdict

Stack multiple behavioral pieces and write the generalization plan up front to push pica to near-zero and keep it there.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating pica in residential, school, or clinic settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only handle verbal adults with no mouthing issues.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Meier et al. (2012) pulled together every paper they could find on pica in people with developmental disabilities. They looked at how to assess it and how to treat it with behavior tools.

The team wrote a guide for clinicians. They listed gaps where research was thin, like keeping gains after therapy ends.

02

What they found

Behavioral plans can cut pica, but the drop is rarely perfect and often fades once staff change rooms or clients age out.

The review called for plans that mix several tactics and that spell out how to keep and spread the gains.

03

How this fits with other research

Frank-Crawford et al. (2025) later ran the largest case series. They used the same multi-piece recipe and hit ≥90% reduction in 30 of 33 clients. They also tracked generalization and showed it can work in new hands and places, plugging the exact gaps this review worried about.

Ruckle et al. (2023) trimmed the package to a quick trio: teach discard-to-trash, block and redirect, and give competing items. Their lean version still held pica low, proving you can stay light and still win.

Ledford et al. (2019) stretched the idea to a preschool playground. A simple attention-based plan cut pica and stayed in place weeks later, showing the guide works outside the usual clinic.

04

Why it matters

If you treat pica, treat it like a team sport. Start with a full assessment, stack at least two behavioral pieces, and write the generalization and maintenance steps into the plan from day one. The later studies prove this combo can drive pica to near-zero and keep it there even when staff or settings shift.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a written generalization step to your current pica plan: list who will take over, where, and how you will probe next week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
developmental delay, intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Pica is a dangerous form of self-injurious behavior that occurs in people with developmental disabilities who are institutionalized. Studies also indicate that pica has led to the death of people with developmental disabilities. While a number of published studies have demonstrated that pica behavior can be decreased substantially with behavioral treatment, few of these studies incorporated strategies for generalization and maintenance outside of brief sessions. A second limitation of current research is that some studies reduced pica substantially, but pica responses still occurred at rates that are problematic in terms of prevention of adverse consequences, which leaves practitioners with the task of further decreasing pica to protect people exhibiting pica from harm. We make recommendations for assessment, treatment, and prevention of pica for practitioners. These recommendations are based on two extensive reviews of the literature and our extensive experience as practitioners in the treatment of pica. Our hope is that administrators, professionals and practitioners will consider our guidelines and recommendations as they attempt to protect people with pica and developmental disabilities from harm by developing standards for assessment, treatment and prevention for this difficult-to-treat population. Our hope is that children with pica will receive early intervention to prevent pica from developing into life-threatening behavior.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.001