Assessment & Research

Assessing emotional and behavioral problems in children with intellectual disability: revisiting the factor structure of the developmental behavior checklist.

Dekker et al. (2002) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2002
★ The Verdict

Use the five-factor DBC to quickly spot and track emotional problems in kids with intellectual disability.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess or treat children with intellectual disability in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only with typically developing kids or adults.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team looked at the Developmental Behaviour Checklist again. They wanted cleaner subscales for kids with intellectual disability.

They ran a new factor analysis on parent reports. The goal was to find the best way to group problem behaviours.

02

What they found

Five clear factors emerged. The new subscales are Disruptive, Self-Absorbed, Communication, Anxiety, and Social.

Each subscale had good internal consistency. The revised structure is ready for clinical use.

03

How this fits with other research

Hastings et al. (2001) had already shown the original DBC worked well. This study refines that work by trimming extra factors.

Balboni et al. (2014) used similar methods to refine the DABS for diagnosing ID. Both papers show how psychometric tweaks make tools sharper.

Wuang et al. (2009) also shortened a motor test for the same population. The pattern is clear: fewer items, cleaner factors, better reliability.

04

Why it matters

You can now use the five-factor DBC to screen emotional problems in kids with ID. Pick the subscale that matches your concern. Track Disruptive for tantrums, Anxiety for fears, or Communication for language-linked behaviours.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Print the five-factor DBC and score one client using the new subscales to see which area needs intervention first.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
1536
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The objective of the reported study was to reassess the factor structure of the Developmental Behaviour Checklist (DBC) in a large cross-cultural sample representing all levels of intellectual disability. Parent and teacher DBC ratings on a combined sample of 1536 Dutch and Australian children and adolescents (ages 3-22) with mild to profound intellectual disability were used. Principal components analyses produced five subscales: Disruptive/Antisocial, Self-Absorbed. Communication Disturbance, Anxiety, and Social Relating, explaining 43.7% of the total variance. Internal consistencies of these subscales ranged from .66 to .91. The revised factor structure of the DBC appears to be an improved and useful tool for assessing emotional and behavioral problems in children with intellectual disabilities.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2002 · doi:10.1023/a:1021263216093