Ageing in learning difficulties: the development of health care outcome indicators.
This 1994 conference paper gives a starter checklist of ageing-outcomes to track, but you need later studies for the actual numbers and what works.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The paper found nothing new. It only suggested what we should measure. It listed possible indicators like mobility, medication use, and social contact.
There are no numbers, no graphs, and no conclusions about what works.
How this fits with other research
Bauman et al. (1996) later tracked real older adults with ID for years. They saw ADL skills drop after age 60, especially in Down syndrome after 40. This gives the hard data the 1994 paper only asked for.
Griffith et al. (2012) measured fitness in over the adults 50+ with ID. Two-thirds had fitness levels like adults 20-30 years older. Again, this fills the gap the 1994 paper left open.
ASutton et al. (2022) looked at 52 single-case studies on healthcare compliance. They found multi-component packages work, but we still do not know which parts matter most. This shows the field has moved from listing indicators to testing what improves them.
Why it matters
You can use the 1994 indicator list as a quick checklist when you audit ageing services. Pair it with the later data: expect ADL decline after 60, low fitness, and high medication use. Then pick proven tactics like graduated exposure plus DRA to keep clients healthier longer.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print the 1994 indicator list, circle mobility and medication use, and schedule baseline fitness and ADL probes for every client 50+ in your caseload.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A system of outcome indicators for the health and social care of ageing people with learning disabilities is required to ensure that clinicians, planners, purchasers and policy makers can monitor and evaluate the impact of health and social care. As longevity is increasing in people with learning disabilities, special problems are found in the physical health, psychological health and social wellbeing of the elderly. This paper reviews theoretical aspects of outcome indicators, and uses the various classes of outcome measures available to draw up a system of indicators for clinicians, researchers and planners. This paper represents the personal view of the authors, prepared for a conference in August 1992.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1994 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1994.tb00393.x