Assessment & Research

A technique for self-injection of drugs in the study of reinforcement.

DAVIS et al. (1963) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1963
★ The Verdict

Automate the reward and you clean up the data.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who build custom assessment rigs or run operant lab work.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for ready-to-use client programs.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

DAVIS et al. (1963) built a harness that lets lab animals give themselves drugs.

The rig spins like a revolver so the needle never tangles.

Animals press a lever and get an instant injection without a human in the room.

02

What they found

The paper only shows the hardware.

No data on how much drug the animals took or how it changed their behavior.

03

How this fits with other research

Fingeret et al. (1985) later used the same idea on people.

They paid humans for tiny thumb twitches picked up by EMG.

Both studies remove the experimenter and let the response trigger its own reward.

Schaaf et al. (2015) did the same trick for group choice.

They swapped needles and syringes for cheap gamepads and a laptop.

All three papers chase the same goal: let the subject run the show so the data stay clean.

04

Why it matters

When you remove the human hand, you remove human error.

Today you can copy the spirit of the 1963 rig with an automatic treat dispenser, an RFID reader, or a touch-screen kiosk.

Any time you want pure measures of reinforcement, let the client control the delivery.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tape an automatic treat dispenser to your table and let the child’s switch trigger it—no adult reach needed.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Behavioral observations on experimental box being supported by the lip animals may be influenced to an undesirable rear of the barrel. The barrel i degree by the presence of the investigator, rotate completely and to yaw sligh handling or immobilization of the .subject, axis. The plunger does not rota' and stimuli associated with pharmacologic treatments. An automatic, self-administr4tion technique which eliminates these influences is desirable for the study of the reinforcing . effects of drugs. We have developed an appa- ratus enabling repeated injections from a distance on a continuing basis in the unre- -.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1963 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-233