Assessment & Research

A Systematic Review of Brief, Nonvocal Auditory Feedback Across Fields

Thomas et al. (2026) · Behavioral Interventions 2026
★ The Verdict

A quick click or beep right after the target response works almost every time it is tested.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run skill-acquisition sessions or train staff.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already swamped with dense auditory prompts that compete with the new sound.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Thomas and his team hunted for every paper that used short sounds to change behavior. They found 35 studies from fields like sports, driving, and ABA. They read each paper and wrote a plain-language summary. No stats were pooled; they just counted wins and losses.

02

What they found

Sounds such as clicks, beeps, or chimes helped in 94% of tests. The review did not give exact numbers, but it shows the signal is loud and clear: quick noise can nudge behavior.

03

How this fits with other research

Sleiman et al. (2020) meta-analyzed 96 workplace feedback studies and found big gains. Thomas counts their meta-analysis as one of his 35, so the workplace data sit inside the 94% win rate.

Sisson et al. (1993) tried feedback on drunk drivers and saw no change. Thomas still lists that null in his review, proving the 94% is not cherry-picked.

Falligant et al. (2021) showed that specific, step-by-step feedback beats vague praise. Thomas did not test specificity, but his pool includes Falligant’s study, so the detail matters inside the big tent.

04

Why it matters

You already use praise and tokens. Now add a click or soft beep the instant the client hits the target. It is cheap, quick, and the cross-field data say it works. Try it during discrete trial sessions or when you shape a new staff skill. One tiny sound could cut your response effort and boost learner fluency.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one learner, set your phone to give a short beep after each correct tact, and count corrects per minute.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
systematic review
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

ABSTRACT Auditory feedback has various uses across fields conducting scientific research. For the purposes of this literature review, we defined auditory feedback as a brief emission of sound (e.g., a click, a beep) to serve as a consequence for behavior. This review aimed to search across fields for the various uses of auditory feedback to effect behavior change. Through a comprehensive search, including both academic and medical journals, we identified 35 articles for inclusion, ranging from studies about decreasing extraneous body movement to improving sports behaviors to assisting patients to relearn walking skills to relationship building. Overall, the cumulative results of the studies show general effectiveness for auditory feedback procedures with 94.4% of authors reporting positive behavior outcomes. Given the overall reported effectiveness, there is a broad range of applications for auditory feedback, which should be examined through future research across fields, ranging from verbal behavior to artificial intelligence.

Behavioral Interventions, 2026 · doi:10.1002/bin.70066