Assessment & Research

A qualitative analysis of general receptive vocabulary of adolescents with Down syndrome.

Facon et al. (2012) · American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2012
★ The Verdict

Teach vocabulary to Down syndrome learners in the same order you teach anyone else—just aim for more words.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running language assessments or vocabulary programs for teens with Down syndrome.
✗ Skip if BCBAs working only with autism or adult populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Facon et al. (2012) looked at 34 teens with Down syndrome and 34 typical teens.

Both groups took the same receptive vocabulary test.

The researchers lined up every word from easiest to hardest for each teen.

Then they asked: do Down syndrome teens struggle with the same words as typical teens?

02

What they found

When both groups knew the same total number of words, the hard words were the same.

No special "Down syndrome word list" appeared.

A word that was tricky for one Down syndrome teen was usually tricky for a matched typical peer.

03

How this fits with other research

This finding lines up with Leaf et al. (2012). Their big reading review showed vocabulary size—not phonics—explains most reading gaps in Down syndrome.

It also matches MacLean et al. (2011), who found vocabulary drives reading comprehension issues.

Laugeson et al. (2014) looked younger and saw noun-verb gaps, but those gaps still follow the same rank order once size is matched.

So the pattern holds from preschool to adolescence.

04

Why it matters

You can use the same vocabulary lists and teaching order you use for any peer. Focus on growing total word count, not hunting for "special" Down syndrome words.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick your next five target words from the same list you use for typical peers—no need to reshuffle.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
186
Population
down syndrome, intellectual disability, neurotypical
Finding
null

03Original abstract

This study aimed to discover whether general receptive vocabulary is qualitatively phenotypical in Down syndrome. Sixty-two participants with Down syndrome (M age=16.74 years, SD=3.28) were individually matched on general vocabulary raw total score with 62 participants with intellectual disability of undifferentiated etiology (M age=16.20 years, SD=3.08) and 62 typical children (M age=5.32 years, SD=0.82). Item analyses using the transformed item difficulties method to detect differential item functioning across groups showed that the groups' rank orders of item difficulty were highly similar. It was concluded that the general receptive vocabulary of older children and adolescents with Down syndrome is not qualitatively distinguished when its overall size is held constant. Methodological and theoretical implications of this finding are discussed.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.3.243