Assessment & Research

A longitudinal study on gross motor development in children with learning disorders.

Westendorp et al. (2014) · Research in developmental disabilities 2014
★ The Verdict

Expect 3- to 4-year gross-motor delays in 11-year-olds with learning disorders; plan extended skill-building timelines.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing PE or social-play goals for late-elementary kids with LD or SLI.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only infants or adults.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Westendorp et al. (2014) followed the same group of kids with learning disorders every year from age 7 to 11.

They used standard motor tests to track two skill sets: moving the body through space (locomotor) and handling balls (object control).

02

What they found

By age 11, these children still moved like typical 7- or 8-year-olds. The gap stayed wide for both running and throwing.

The delay was not a short lag; it was a steady 3- to 4-year deficit that did not close over time.

03

How this fits with other research

Chiviacowsky et al. (2013) saw the same pattern in children with specific language impairment. Their motor and literacy scores also sat years below peers, showing the problem crosses different learning labels.

de Chaves et al. (2016) adds a twist. Their large survey linked poor strength and high BMI to coordination problems, but they also found some kids outgrew the issue. Marieke’s data say the gap stays open when a learning disorder is present.

De Kegel et al. (2016) tracked babies with cytomegalovirus and found early gross-motor delays by 24 months. Together, these studies trace one long line: motor deficits can start in infancy and remain sizable through late elementary school once a clinical diagnosis is on board.

04

Why it matters

If your learner has a learning disorder, plan for a multi-year motor curriculum. Don’t expect a quick catch-up by grade five. Embed extra practice for running, catching, and balance into the day, and write goals that stretch across semesters, not weeks.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one 5-minute locomotor warm-up to your session and track trials across the month.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
56
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
negative
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

This longitudinal study examined the development of gross motor skills, and sex-differences therein, in 7- to 11-years-old children with learning disorders (LD) and compared the results with typically developing children to determine the performance level of children with LD. In children with LD (n=56; 39 boys, 17 girls), gross motor skills were assessed with the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 and measured annually during a 3-year period. Motor scores of 253 typically developing children (125 boys, 112 girls) were collected for references values. The multilevel analyses showed that the ball skills of children with LD improved with age (p<.001), especially between 7 and 9 years, but the locomotor skills did not (p=.50). Boys had higher ball skill scores than girls (p=.002) and these differences were constant over time. Typically developing children outperformed the children with LD on the locomotor skills and ball skills at all ages, except the locomotor skills at age 7. Children with LD develop their ball skills later in the primary school-period compared to typically developing peers. However, 11 year-old children with LD had a lag in locomotor skills and ball skills of at least four and three years, respectively, compared to their peers.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.018