Assessment & Research

A Comparative Study of Sociability in Angelman, Cornelia de Lange, Fragile X, Down and Rubinstein Taybi Syndromes and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Moss et al. (2016) · American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2016
★ The Verdict

Fragile X, Cornelia de Lange and ASD show the lowest caregiver-rated sociability among six neurogenetic disorders.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing social-skills plans for clients with FXS, CdLS, ASD or DS.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only mild learning disability without these syndromes.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Parents filled out the Sociability Questionnaire for Intellectual Disability (SQID).

The survey covered six groups: Angelman, Cornelia de Lange, Fragile X, Down, Rubinstein-Taybi syndromes and autism spectrum disorder.

Each group had children or adults with intellectual disability.

02

What they found

Caregivers rated Fragile X, Cornelia de Lange and ASD as the least sociable.

Angelman, Down and Rubinstein-Taybi scored higher on friendly eye contact, greeting and chat.

Selective mutism traits also differed by syndrome.

03

How this fits with other research

Cook et al. (2021) extends the Down picture. They split DS-only from DS+ASD and showed the dual diagnosis has far worse expressive language than DS alone.

Zhu et al. (2016) ran parallel work in Chinese boys with FXS. They found FXS boys trailed DS peers in socialisation and self-care, matching the low sociability rank seen here.

Bellon-Harn et al. (2020) took the FXS focus further. They proved the ASIEP-3 interaction tool gives reliable social scores in FXS, giving you a ready instrument to track the poor sociability this paper flags.

04

Why it matters

Use the SQID snapshot to set social-skills priorities. If your client has Fragile X, Cornelia de Lange or ASD, plan denser social practice and peer entry steps. Pair the ASIEP-3 for FXS learners to get measurable social targets. Always screen for ASD inside Down syndrome; the dual label signals you will need heavier language and social programming.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run the ASIEP-3 interaction subtest on any FXS learner and add two peer greeting trials to the next session.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
618
Population
autism spectrum disorder, down syndrome, intellectual disability, other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Few comparative studies have evaluated the heterogeneity of sociability across a range of neurodevelopmental disorders. The Sociability Questionnaire for People with Intellectual Disability (SQID) was completed by caregivers of individuals with Cornelia de Lange (n = 98), Angelman (n = 66), Fragile X (n = 142), Down (n = 117) and Rubinstein Taybi (n = 88) syndromes and autism spectrum disorder (ASD; n = 107). Between groups and age-band (<12yrs; 12-18yrs; >18yrs) comparisons of SQID scores were conducted. Rates of behaviors indicative of selective mutism were also examined. Fragile X syndrome achieved the lowest SQID scores. Cornelia de Lange, ASD, and Fragile X groups scored significantly lower than Angelman, Down and Rubinstein Taybi groups. Selective mutism characteristics were highest in Cornelia de Lange (40%) followed by Fragile X (17.8%) and ASD (18.2%). Age-band differences were identified in Cornelia de Lange and Down syndrome.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2016 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-121.6.465