ABA Fundamentals

Yoked variable-ratio and variable-interval responding in pigeons.

Catania et al. (1977) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1977
★ The Verdict

Variable-ratio schedules give faster responding than matched variable-interval schedules, but the speed can fade faster when reinforcement stops.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who shape skill fluency or reduce response latency in clinic or classroom settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only with time-based token or DRO systems where response count is not the goal.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Clark et al. (1977) worked with pigeons in a small lab chamber. Each bird pecked a lit key for grain.

Some birds got a variable-ratio (VR) schedule. They had to peck a changing number of times for each grain.

Other birds got a matched variable-interval (VI) schedule. They got grain for the first peck after random time windows.

The team kept the grain rate the same for both groups. They just wanted to see how the rule, not the amount of food, changed peck speed.

02

What they found

VR pigeons pecked faster than VI pigeons. The jump showed up in two to four short sessions.

The extra pecks did not earn more grain. The schedule rule alone drove the higher rate.

03

How this fits with other research

Cullinan et al. (2001) ran the same yoked VR-VI setup and got the same rate boost. They added a twist: when grain stopped, VR birds quit faster. High rate can mean low staying power.

McKearney (1970) also saw VR out-run VI, but under mild electric shock. VR pecking dropped sooner and came back slower. Again, speed came with fragility.

Katz et al. (2003) looked inside VI bouts with rats. Adding a tiny VR4 rule made rats start new bouts more often. The same force that lifts VR rate also shapes the micro-rhythm of VI work.

04

Why it matters

You now have a quick test to boost client response: switch from time-based to response-based reinforcement. Use VR schedules for seat-work, trials, or steps in a task analysis. Watch rate climb in just a few sessions. Keep an eye on durability—if reinforcement pauses, the faster learner may also quit faster. Pair VR with brief booster VI spells or thicker reinforcement to keep the gain and the staying power.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Flip one block of trials from fixed-time tokens to a VR3 schedule and count responses for three days.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Pigeons' key pecks were maintained by variable-ratio or variable-interval schedules of food reinforcement. For pairs of pigeons in one group, variable-ratio reinforcement was arranged for one pigeon's pecks; for the second pigeon, reinforcement was arranged according to a variable-interval schedule yoked to the interreinforcement times produced by the first pigeon. For pairs of pigeons in another group, variable-interval reinforcement was arranged for one pigeon's pecks; for the second pigeon, reinforcement was arranged according to a variable-ratio schedule yoked to the interreinforcement responses produced by the first pigeon. For each pair, the yoking procedure was maintained for four or five consecutive sessions of 50 reinforcements each. In more than three-quarters of the pairs, variable-ratio response rates were higher than variable-interval rates within two sessions; in all cases, the rate difference developed within four sessions.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.28-155