Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children.
Letting autistic kids briefly earn their own stereotypy can power better work than snacks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with autistic children who had lots of hand-flapping and rocking.
They set up a simple choice. Kids could earn tiny candies or earn two minutes of flapping time.
Tasks were things like matching colors. The kids never got both rewards at once.
An ABAB design showed which reward made the kids work faster.
What they found
Kids answered more items correctly when they earned flapping time.
Food prizes came in second.
Best part: letting them flap as a reward did not make the flapping worse later.
How this fits with other research
Fixsen et al. (1972) once said you must stop stereotypy or learning will fail.
Charlop et al. (1990) flip that idea: the same stereotypy can fuel learning if you treat it like a prize.
Ahrens et al. (2011) watched stereotypy stop on its own and warned against quick jumps to intervene.
The two views seem to clash, but they looked at different moments. N et al. watched free play; H et al. ran teaching trials. When work is on the line, brief earned flaps help more than silence.
Ventola et al. (2016) adds a side note: programs that boost social talk can also lower repetitive acts without touching them directly.
Why it matters
You can stop fighting stereotypy during lessons. Let the child trade a correct answer for twenty seconds of rocking or hand-flapping, then right back to work. You get more correct responses and no burst of problem behavior. Try it next time edibles stop working.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one short stereotypic act, set a timer for two minutes, and let the child exchange one correct response for that timed flap break.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In a series of experiments, we assessed the efficacy of using autistic children's aberrant behaviors as reinforcers to increase their correct task responding. In Experiment 1, reinforcer conditions of stereotypy, food, and varied (food or stereotypy) were compared. In Experiment 2, the conditions were delayed echolalia, food, and varied (food or delayed echolalia), and in Experiment 3, perseverative behavior was compared with stereotypy and food as potential reinforcers. A multielement design was used for all comparisons, and side-effect measures were recorded during and after teaching sessions as well as at home. Results indicated that, in general, task performance was highest when brief opportunities to engage in aberrant behaviors were provided as reinforcers. Edibles were associated with the lowest performance. Furthermore, no negative side effects (e.g., an increase in aberrant behaviors) occurred. The results are discussed in terms of suggesting a more pragmatic treatment approach by addressing the contingent use of autistic children's aberrant behaviors as reinforcers.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1990 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-163