ABA Fundamentals

Treating problem behaviors maintained by negative reinforcement.

Cipani et al. (1997) · Research in developmental disabilities 1997
★ The Verdict

When your FA shows escape keeps the behavior alive, pick one of four clear roads: FCT, momentum, DNRO, or errorless learning.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write plans for kids or adults who act out to avoid tasks.
✗ Skip if Practitioners looking for brand-new data or stats.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

McMillan et al. (1997) wrote a how-to paper for BCBAs.

They listed four tactics to use when a functional analysis shows problem behavior is kept going by escape.

The four tactics are functional communication training, behavioral momentum, differential reinforcement of other escape, and errorless learning.

The paper gives no new data; it is a map, not a test.

02

What they found

The authors found that no single review had put these four escape-based tools side by side.

They showed when to pick each one and how to mix them.

03

How this fits with other research

Kodak et al. (2003) later tested two of the four tools.

They ran DNRO and noncontingent escape with two children.

Both tactics cut problem behavior and raised compliance, proving the map works.

Phillips et al. (2019) added a fifth tool: diaphragmatic breathing.

It helped only one of three children; the rest still needed reinforcement.

This does not break the map—it just shows you may need more than breathing.

Fahmie et al. (2013) counted 435 FA studies.

That big pile of data backs the first step the 1997 paper urges: do an FA before you choose a tactic.

04

Why it matters

You now have a short checklist for escape-maintained behavior.

Run a quick FA, then pick one of four proven roads: FCT, momentum, DNRO, or errorless.

If breathing fits your case, try it, but keep the reinforcement roads open.

Use the list next time you write a behavior plan—it saves you from starting from scratch.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open your last escape-maintained plan and check if it uses one of the four listed tactics—if not, swap it in.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The examination of controlling contingencies in an analysis of problem behavior has been an important clinical topic of discussion in the field of developmental disabilities for many years. We know that problem behavior may be maintained by positive reinforcement or by negative reinforcement. From a clinical perspective, we seem to know more about behavioral techniques that are used when the problem behavior is maintained by positive reinforcement that we understand about those techniques that may be applied when a problem behavior is maintained by negative reinforcement. In this paper, we identify four treatment techniques that may be applied when problem; behavior is maintained by negative reinforcement: (a) functional communication training; (b) behavioral momentum; (c) differential reinforcement or an alternative escape behavior; and (d) errorless learning. Each of the four techniques will be defined, applications and guidelines for use delineated.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1997 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00014-0