Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli.
Use a progressive-delay prompt-fade to shift control from modeled cues to spoken instructions when teaching new compliance responses.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three teens with intellectual disability learned to follow spoken instructions. First the teacher modeled each action. Then she added a short wait before modeling. The wait got longer each day.
The goal was to move control from the modeled cue to the spoken word alone.
What they found
All three students finally obeyed the verbal cue without any model. New, untrained instructions did not improve; the skill stayed tied to the exact lines that were taught.
How this fits with other research
Nangle et al. (1993) used the same prompt-fade recipe with preschoolers, but they shifted control from picture labels to intraverbal answers. Both studies show the tactic works across ages and skills.
Todorov et al. (1984) kept the same fade but taught manual signs instead of spoken commands. They also tracked generalization across rooms and people. Their learners showed some carry-over, while S et al. saw none with vocal instructions. The difference warns us that generalization is not automatic; you have to plan for it.
Wing (1981) also used a parent-delivered fade, yet the target was fear, not compliance. Together these papers prove the progressive-delay fade is a sturdy tool that travels across goals, mediators, and response forms.
Why it matters
If a client only follows your gesture, add a brief pause before you move. Stretch that pause a little each day. Soon the word alone will control the action. Plan extra steps if you want the response to spread to new instructions, new places, or new people.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Before giving a model, count ‘one-Mississippi’; lengthen the wait each day until the learner moves after the words alone.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A transfer of stimulus control procedure was used to teach three profoundly retarded adolescents a series of specific responses to specific verbal instructions. After imitative control of a behavior was established, a verbal instruction was presented immediately before the behavior was modelled. Each correct response was followed on the next trial by inserting a delay between the verbal instruction and the modelling of the behavior. The delays increased from trial to trial. Transfer of stimulus control was indicated when a subject responded correctly on five consecutive trials before the behavior was modelled. All three subjects responded correctly to each verbal instruction after that item was trained in a multiple-baseline order. Generalization did not occur to items that had not been trained. Probe data revealed that some variations of the verbal instructions controlled responses after training was completed.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-123