Acquisition and cross-setting generalization of manual signs with severely retarded individuals.
Old-school prompt fading still teaches manual signs to clients with severe ID and can spark use with new people and places.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four adults with severe intellectual disability learned manual signs.
A speech clinician used a transfer-of-control procedure. She first guided each hand, then faded help until the client signed alone.
The team tracked if the signs also appeared with new staff and in new rooms.
What they found
All four people learned the signs. Some used them right away with other adults and in the lunchroom. Others needed extra practice before the sign showed up anywhere else.
Generalization was spotty, but it did happen for every participant.
How this fits with other research
Striefel et al. (1974) did the same prompt-fade trick ten years earlier. They moved control from hand cues to spoken words in teenagers with ID. C et al. simply swapped the end target: manual signs instead of verbal answers.
Nangle et al. (1993) later copied the logic with preschoolers who had no disability. The kids learned to answer questions out loud. The pattern is clear—transfer of control works across ages, diagnoses, and response forms.
Stasolla et al. (2015) push the idea further. They gave kids with cerebral palsy a microswitch laptop so they could “speak” without signs. The 1984 study shows the first step: teach the hand movement; the 2015 study adds tech when hands alone can’t do the job.
Why it matters
If you run programs for adults or children who don’t speak, start with hands-on help and fade it fast. Don’t wait for perfect generalization—plan extra sessions in each new place or with each new helper. The old procedure still works and sets the stage for high-tech options later.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one sign, model it hand-over-hand, then fade your touch each trial until the client moves alone.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In this study, we assessed the effect of a transfer of stimulus control procedure on the acquisition and cross-setting generalization of manual signs with four profoundly retarded individuals. Two individuals were trained to produce appropriate signs to verbal instructions, whereas the other two were trained until manual signs were controlled by visual stimuli (objects). Data obtained from three probe situations (two for one individual) constituted the dependent variables of the investigation. The results, gathered within a multiple-baseline design across signs showed that individuals acquired the trained signs and maintenance and generalization across settings (classroom, ward) and persons (teachers, ward staff) occurred, but was highly variable between and within individuals.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-93