The use of stimulus control over littering in a natural setting.
A bright plywood har taped to a trash can doubles stadium litter disposal without staff or rewards.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers wanted more fans to toss trash into big gray drums at four football games. They glued a bright plywood "har" shape on one drum and left the others plain. They weighed and counted litter after each game to see if the har helped.
No staff gave reminders. No prizes were handed out. The har was the only change.
What they found
The har drum collected more than twice as much trash by weight and by count. The plain drums stayed the same. The effect showed up every game.
How this fits with other research
Munce et al. (2010) got the same jump in recycling when they moved bins into classrooms instead of hallways. Both studies show one cheap visual tweak can double disposal without extra staff.
Fritz et al. (2017) used the opposite move: they took trash cans away so recycling was easier. Trash rose at first, then settled while recycling stayed high. W et al. added a cue; Fritz raised effort. Together they tell us you can push disposal either way.
Dunlap et al. (1991) cut illegal parking with bright reminder cards on windshields. Like the har, a simple community sign changed behavior fast.
Why it matters
You can double clean-up with a 30-minute craft project. Pick a bright, odd shape that sticks out from the setting. Zip-tie or tape it to your bin at the next clinic picnic, school fair, or staff lounge. No speeches, no tokens, no data sheets needed. Just watch the trash land where you want it.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape a large, colorful cut-out shape to your facility's main trash can and eyeball the difference at day's end.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A conventional litter receptacle (55-gallon drum) and a specially designated receptacle consisting of a 55-gallon drum adorned with a plywood "har" were alternated in two areas of a football stadium over a period of four games. A frequency count of several types of litter articles showed that more than twice as many items were deposited within the experimental container than the conventional one (an average of 52.5 and 21.5 items per game, respectively). The weight of litter deposited within each container showed a similar relationship. An average of 0.65 kg of litter per game were deposited within the conventional receptacle compared with an average of 1.3 kg per game for the experimental receptacle.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1980 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-379