The psychiatric nurse as a behavioral engineer.
Simple nurse-led ward changes still beat talk-only care and paved the way for token economies and staff pay-for-performance.
01Research in Context
What this study did
AYLLON et al. (1959) watched psychiatric nurses on an adult ward.
The nurses moved chairs, changed meal seating, and gave quick praise.
No pills, no talk therapy—just small environmental tweaks.
The team wrote down each patient’s behavior before and after the tweaks.
What they found
Disruptive acts dropped.
Patients ate more, talked more, and followed rules more often.
The nurses became “behavioral engineers” without extra staff or cost.
How this fits with other research
Boren et al. (1970) ran the next step on the same kind of ward.
They added token points, fines, and response cost.
The token system kept the nurse-engineer idea but made it stronger.
Pomerleau et al. (1973) paid aides cash when their patients improved.
Cash plus daily graphs beat free money and long meetings.
Together these papers show a path: first tweak, then token, then pay-for-outcomes.
Why it matters
You can start small today.
Re-arrange chairs so eyes face staff at meds line.
Praise the first patient who sits quietly.
Track one behavior for one shift.
These 1959 moves still cut problem behavior and need no extra budget.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one disruptive behavior, move the furniture to make the right response easier, and praise the first three patients who do it.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The behavior which leads to a person's admission to a mental hospital often involves danger to himself or others, withdrawal from normal social functions, or a dramatic change from his usual mode of behaving.The professional staff of the psychiatric hospital directs its major efforts toward the discovery of the flaw in the patient's mental apparatus which presumably underlies his disturbing and dangerous behavior.Following the medical para- digm, it is presumed that once the basic disfunction has been properly identified the ap- propriate treatment will be undertaken and the various manifestations of the disfunction will disappear.While diagnosis is being made and during subsequent treatment, the patient is under the daily care of the psychiatric nurses3 in the ward.There, he often exhibits annoying and disrupting behavior which is usually regarded as a further manifestation of his basic difficulty.This behavior is sometimes identical with that which led to his admission; but at other times it seems to originate and develop within the hospital setting.Although it is still regarded as a reflection of his basic problem, this disruptive behavior may become so persistent that it engages the full energies of the nurses, and postpones, sometimes per- manently, any effort on their part to deal with the so-called basic problem.Disrupting behaviors usually consist in the patient's failure to engage in activities which are considered normal and necessary; or his persistent engagement in activities that are harmful to himself or other patients, or disrupting in other ways.For example, failures to eat, dress, bathe, interact socially with other patients, and walk without being led are invariably disruptive.Hoarding various objects, hitting, pinching, spitting on other patients, constant attention-seeking actions with respect to the nurses, upsetting chairs in the day- room, scraping paint from the walls, breaking windows, stuffing paper in the mouth and ears, walking on haunches or while in a squatting position are disruptive when they occur frequently and persistently.At present, no systematic approach to such problems is available to the nurses.A psycho- dynamic interpretation is often given by psychiatrists and psychologists; and, for that matter, the nurses sometimes construct "depth" interpretations themselves.These interpre- tations seldom suggest any specific remedial actions to the nurses, who then have no other recourse than to act on the basis of common sense, or to take advantage of the physical therapy in vogue.From the point of view of modern behavior theory, such strong behaviors, or behavioral deficits, may be considered the result of events occurring in the patient's immediate or historical environment rather than the manifestations of his mental disorder.The present research represents an attempt to discover and manipulate some of these en- vironmental variables for the purpose of modifying the problem behavior.'This paper contains a portion of the data from a doctoral dissertation submitted to the Department of Psy- chology, University of Houston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree, in August, 1959.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1959 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1959.2-323