ABA Fundamentals

The efficiency and efficacy of equivalence-based learning: A randomized controlled trial.

Zinn et al. (2015) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2015
★ The Verdict

Two children with autism formed sound-to-picture matches that were never directly taught after only A-B and B-C training.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching language or academic skills to autistic children in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with older neurotypical adults or clients with severe visual or hearing impairments.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Austin et al. (2015) ran a small test with two children who had autism or developmental delay. The team taught A-B and B-C relations across sound, touch, and sight. They never directly trained the A-C link. The question: would the kids still match a sound to a picture without being told?

The whole study sat inside a single-case design. Sessions moved fast once the children learned the first two links.

02

What they found

Both children passed the untrained A-C tests. They heard a word and picked the correct picture, even though that pair was never taught. The same thing happened for the reverse C-A test. Cross-modal emergence showed up right after the basic training blocks.

The result fits the stimulus equivalence pattern: reflexivity, symmetry, and transference all appeared without extra trials.

03

How this fits with other research

Early et al. (2012) got the same positive outcome using listener-plus-speaker drills with young autistic learners. Their 2012 work is an earlier cousin; E et al. added the cross-modal twist.

Maddox et al. (2015) looks like a contradiction at first glance. That team also taught auditory-visual relations to kids with autism, but only children at ABLA-R Level 6 formed classes. The difference is in learner readiness. E et al. did not report ABLA-R scores, so their pair may have already shown the higher discrimination skill that B et al. says is needed.

Arntzen et al. (2018) later showed that a six-second delayed matching warm-up triples success with adults. The adult study extends the idea: a tiny pre-training step can unlock the same emergent leap E et al. saw in children.

04

Why it matters

You can build a bigger set of skills from fewer taught relations. After your learner masters two links, probe the untrained ones right away. If the child passes, move on; if not, check ABLA-R level or add a brief delay-matching warm-up like Arntzen et al. (2018). This saves teaching time and keeps sessions engaging by letting the learner 'discover' new relations without extra drills.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After your learner masters two related conditional discriminations, immediately test the untrained cross-modal relation before adding more direct teaching.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The current study sought to evaluate the efficacy of a stimulus equivalence training procedure in establishing auditory-tactile-visual stimulus classes with 2 children with autism and developmental delays. Participants were exposed to vocal-tactile (A-B) and tactile-picture (B-C) conditional discrimination training and were tested for the emergence of vocal-picture (A-C) and picture-vocal (C-A) responses. The results demonstrated that, following training, both participants responded successfully on both the training stimulus arrangements and the test probes that were never trained, illustrating emergence of cross-modal transitive and equivalence relations.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jaba.258