The efficiency and efficacy of equivalence-based learning: A randomized controlled trial.
Two children with autism formed sound-to-picture matches that were never directly taught after only A-B and B-C training.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Austin et al. (2015) ran a small test with two children who had autism or developmental delay. The team taught A-B and B-C relations across sound, touch, and sight. They never directly trained the A-C link. The question: would the kids still match a sound to a picture without being told?
The whole study sat inside a single-case design. Sessions moved fast once the children learned the first two links.
What they found
Both children passed the untrained A-C tests. They heard a word and picked the correct picture, even though that pair was never taught. The same thing happened for the reverse C-A test. Cross-modal emergence showed up right after the basic training blocks.
The result fits the stimulus equivalence pattern: reflexivity, symmetry, and transference all appeared without extra trials.
How this fits with other research
Early et al. (2012) got the same positive outcome using listener-plus-speaker drills with young autistic learners. Their 2012 work is an earlier cousin; E et al. added the cross-modal twist.
Maddox et al. (2015) looks like a contradiction at first glance. That team also taught auditory-visual relations to kids with autism, but only children at ABLA-R Level 6 formed classes. The difference is in learner readiness. E et al. did not report ABLA-R scores, so their pair may have already shown the higher discrimination skill that B et al. says is needed.
Arntzen et al. (2018) later showed that a six-second delayed matching warm-up triples success with adults. The adult study extends the idea: a tiny pre-training step can unlock the same emergent leap E et al. saw in children.
Why it matters
You can build a bigger set of skills from fewer taught relations. After your learner masters two links, probe the untrained ones right away. If the child passes, move on; if not, check ABLA-R level or add a brief delay-matching warm-up like Arntzen et al. (2018). This saves teaching time and keeps sessions engaging by letting the learner 'discover' new relations without extra drills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →After your learner masters two related conditional discriminations, immediately test the untrained cross-modal relation before adding more direct teaching.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The current study sought to evaluate the efficacy of a stimulus equivalence training procedure in establishing auditory-tactile-visual stimulus classes with 2 children with autism and developmental delays. Participants were exposed to vocal-tactile (A-B) and tactile-picture (B-C) conditional discrimination training and were tested for the emergence of vocal-picture (A-C) and picture-vocal (C-A) responses. The results demonstrated that, following training, both participants responded successfully on both the training stimulus arrangements and the test probes that were never trained, illustrating emergence of cross-modal transitive and equivalence relations.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jaba.258