ABA Fundamentals

The efficiency and efficacy of equivalence-based learning: A randomized controlled trial.

Zinn et al. (2015) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2015
★ The Verdict

Two children with autism formed sound-to-picture matches that were never directly taught after only A-B and B-C training.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching language or academic skills to autistic children in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with older neurotypical adults or clients with severe visual or hearing impairments.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Austin et al. (2015) ran a small test with two children who had autism or developmental delay. The team taught A-B and B-C relations across sound, touch, and sight. They never directly trained the A-C link. The question: would the kids still match a sound to a picture without being told?

The whole study sat inside a single-case design. Sessions moved fast once the children learned the first two links.

02

What they found

Both children passed the untrained A-C tests. They heard a word and picked the correct picture, even though that pair was never taught. The same thing happened for the reverse C-A test. Cross-modal emergence showed up right after the basic training blocks.

The result fits the stimulus equivalence pattern: reflexivity, symmetry, and transference all appeared without extra trials.

03

How this fits with other research

Early et al. (2012) got the same positive outcome using listener-plus-speaker drills with young autistic learners. Their 2012 work is an earlier cousin; E et al. added the cross-modal twist.

Maddox et al. (2015) looks like a contradiction at first glance. That team also taught auditory-visual relations to kids with autism, but only children at ABLA-R Level 6 formed classes. The difference is in learner readiness. E et al. did not report ABLA-R scores, so their pair may have already shown the higher discrimination skill that B et al. says is needed.

Arntzen et al. (2018) later showed that a six-second delayed matching warm-up triples success with adults. The adult study extends the idea: a tiny pre-training step can unlock the same emergent leap E et al. saw in children.

04

Why it matters

You can build a bigger set of skills from fewer taught relations. After your learner masters two links, probe the untrained ones right away. If the child passes, move on; if not, check ABLA-R level or add a brief delay-matching warm-up like Arntzen et al. (2018). This saves teaching time and keeps sessions engaging by letting the learner 'discover' new relations without extra drills.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After your learner masters two related conditional discriminations, immediately test the untrained cross-modal relation before adding more direct teaching.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The current study sought to evaluate the efficacy of a stimulus equivalence training procedure in establishing auditory-tactile-visual stimulus classes with 2 children with autism and developmental delays. Participants were exposed to vocal-tactile (A-B) and tactile-picture (B-C) conditional discrimination training and were tested for the emergence of vocal-picture (A-C) and picture-vocal (C-A) responses. The results demonstrated that, following training, both participants responded successfully on both the training stimulus arrangements and the test probes that were never trained, illustrating emergence of cross-modal transitive and equivalence relations.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jaba.258