ABA Fundamentals

The effects of matched stimulation and response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy.

Love et al. (2012) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2012
★ The Verdict

Pairing RIRD with matched stimulation can slightly improve stereotypy suppression and increase appropriate vocalizations, but RIRD alone still does the heavy lifting.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating vocal stereotypy in children with autism or developmental delays.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with adults or clients whose stereotypy is motor-based, not vocal.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers compared two ways to quiet vocal stereotypy. One was response interruption and redirection (RIRD). The other was matched stimulation (MS) — giving toys that make the same kind of sounds the child already likes.

They used an alternating-treatments design. Each child got RIRD alone, MS alone, and both together in rotating sessions.

02

What they found

Both RIRD and MS cut vocal stereotypy. When the team combined them, one child showed even less stereotypy. Both children also used more appropriate words during the combo condition.

03

How this fits with other research

Shawler et al. (2020) ran almost the same matchup. They also saw RIRD beat MS alone, but they found a bigger gap. The 2020 study used sound-making toys, which may explain the stronger toy effect.

Sivaraman et al. (2020) added a time twist. They showed RIRD only keeps working after you stop if you run it for 20-minute blocks. The 2012 paper did not test carry-over, so we still don’t know if the combo lasts longer.

Dawson et al. (2000) warned that single-set MS can fade fast. Rotating toy sets every 10 minutes keeps noncontingent reinforcement strong. If you copy the 2012 combo, rotate the matched toys to avoid quick habituation.

04

Why it matters

If a child’s vocal stereotypy is loud and continuous, start with RIRD. Then add matched stimulation only if you can rotate sound toys every 10 minutes. Track both stereotypy and appropriate speech; the combo may give you a small extra drop in stereotypy and a free boost in functional words.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a 10-minute RIRD session, then give a sound-making toy for 5 minutes; record stereotypy and any new words.

02At a glance

Intervention
extinction
Design
alternating treatments
Sample size
2
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
small

03Original abstract

Stereotypy has been classified as repetitive behavior that does not serve any apparent function. Two procedures that have been found to reduce rates of vocal stereotypy effectively are response interruption and redirection (RIRD) and noncontingent access to matched stimulation (MS). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of RIRD alone, MS alone, and MS combined with RIRD. One participant's results suggested similar suppressive effects on vocal stereotypy across treatment conditions. For the second participant, a slightly greater suppression of stereotypy was associated with MS + RIRD. In addition, both participants emitted a greater frequency of appropriate vocalizations in conditions with RIRD. Data suggest that the addition of MS might facilitate the implementation of RIRD in applied settings.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2012 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-549