The effects of a sensory extinction procedure on stereotypic sounds of two autistic children.
White-noise headphones can quickly test and cut vocal stereotypy maintained by auditory feedback.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Two autistic children wore headphones during play sessions. White noise played through the phones blocked the sound of their own loud humming and squealing.
The researchers used an ABAB design. They turned the white noise on, off, on, off to see if stereotypy changed with the sound.
What they found
Vocal stereotypy dropped sharply when the white noise was on. Clapping and dropping toys stayed the same.
The effect was quick and reversed each time the noise stopped.
How this fits with other research
Murphy (1982) first showed that sensory input can reinforce stereotypy. Davison et al. (1984) tested one way to remove that input.
Carr et al. (2002) later paired white-noise ideas with response blocking and non-contingent reinforcement. Their package cut object mouthing after each part alone had failed.
Case-Smith et al. (2015) warned that most sensory tricks lack proof. The 1984 study is one of the few single-case tests they would count.
Why it matters
If a client hums or squeals for automatic reinforcement, try brief white-noise trials. Keep the headset on for a few minutes, then remove it. Track the vocal behavior each time. If it drops and returns, you likely found sensory reinforcement. Pair the mask with other skills like toy play to avoid silent side effects.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a 5-minute white-noise probe during play; count vocal stereotypy before, during, and after.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A reversal design was used to investigate the effects of a sensory extinction procedure on stereotypic sounds produced by two autistic children. White noise programmed through earphones was used to mask auditory stimuli resulting from aberrant vocalizations (termed "slurring," "snorts," and "arias") and from clapping hands and dropping objects. This sensory extinction procedure substantially reduced the stereotypic vocalizations but had little practical effect on the clapping and object-dropping responses. The discussion addresses some of the limitations and potential uses of sensory extinction procedures.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1984 · doi:10.1007/BF02409580