The disruption of autoshaped key pecking in the pigeon by food-tray illumination.
Extra feeder light cut autoshaped key pecks—keep reinforcement signals spare to protect the response.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with pigeons in a small lab chamber. A key lit up for a few seconds before grain arrived.
On some trials the food tray also lit up when the key did. The team counted key pecks to see if the extra light changed behavior.
What they found
Birds pecked the key far less when the feeder glowed at the same time. The added light pulled their attention away from the key.
The simple lesson: extra reinforcement cues can back-fire and weaken the response you want.
How this fits with other research
Zentall et al. (1975) ran a near-copy study the next year. They also saw brighter cues cut key pecks, matching the 1974 result.
Christophersen et al. (1972) showed the same problem two years earlier. A lit key slowed learning about airflow cues, proving extra visual stimuli can overshadow the target signal.
Redd (1969) had good news: autoshaping works with shock reduction. The 1974 paper shows the flip side—once the response is running, added feeder light can still knock it down.
Why it matters
Keep your reinforcement signals clean. If you pair a tablet app with music, or give extra visual flashes when tokens drop, you may accidentally lower the response you just shaped. Run a quick A-B-A check: present the reinforcer with and without the extra cue, and watch the data. If responding dips, drop the add-on and stay with one clear stimulus.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Remove any extra lights or sounds that occur at the same time as your reinforcer delivery, then measure if responding rises.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two experiments investigated the effect of food-tray illumination on pecking a lighted key that signalled food presentation. Pigeons key pecked less when both feeder and key stimuli preceded grain delivery than when the keylight alone signalled food. This detractive influence of grain-tray illumination did not result after prior pairings of the keylight with food. The involvement of associative and physical variables in autoshaping the pigeon's key peck is considered in light of these findings.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-39