ABA Fundamentals

The Davis platform.

Huntley (1969) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1969
★ The Verdict

A 19th-century bird feeder already worked like a Skinner box, reminding us the core hardware is older than the science.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who teach history of behavior analysis or run pigeon labs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct treatment data.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Zimmerman (1969) tells a short story about a bird feeder built in the 1840s.

The feeder gave seeds when birds pecked a small key.

No data were collected; the paper just shows the gadget looked like a tiny Skinner box.

02

What they found

The key-peck-plus-food setup existed 80 years before Skinner’s lab.

Birds already worked for food the same way pigeons later did in operant chambers.

03

How this fits with other research

Asano et al. (2012) dug up a 1952 cumulative recorder that bridged prototype and the Model C-1. Together the two papers show hardware ideas kept re-inventing before they became standard lab tools.

Meyer et al. (1987) built a modern pellet dispenser for bird feeding studies. Their paper extends the same line of thought: engineers keep refining automatic food delivery for birds.

Fournier et al. (2004) found the words “cumulative record” were used before Skinner. Pair that with W’s gadget and you see both the tools and the terms pre-date the famous lab.

04

Why it matters

Next time you set up an operant chamber, remember the idea is older than the field itself. Sharing this story with new RBTs can spark curiosity about why we still use key-peck and food-magazine designs that started in a backyard 180 years ago.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Show your trainees the 1840s feeder photo and ask, "Why does this still look familiar?"

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Bird watchers (the out-of-doors variety) operate hap- pily on a schedule of intermittent reinforcement. Of the various rewards available to them, probably the one with the greatest effect is that of happening upon the unexpected. Such was the case for the writer, who in reading a new work on the finch family, found a report of what may well have been the first rough Skinner box, complete with key and food magazine. While there is clearly no historical tie between this early device made by a naturalist interested in problem- solving in wild birds and B. F. Skinner's careful in- strumentation, still one is reminded of the observation that novel ideas often turn up in very different places at almost the same time.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1969 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-675