ABA Fundamentals

The behavioral impact of an advertising campaign to promote safety belt use.

Cope et al. (1988) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1988
★ The Verdict

A free soft drink handed out on the spot doubled seat-belt use, but the gain vanished the moment the reward stopped.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running community safety campaigns or token economies with neurotypical adults.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused on skill acquisition with children or clients who cannot drive.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Workers at a drive-through handed a free large soft drink to any driver who pulled in wearing a seat belt. The team counted belt use during four phases: baseline, reward on, reward off, reward on again. They used an ABAB reversal design to prove the drink caused the change.

Observers stood near the exit and simply marked belt or no belt for every car. No personal data were taken. The setting was a busy commercial strip in Virginia, so drivers were regular commuters, not students or patients.

02

What they found

Seat-belt use jumped from a large share to a large share as soon as the free drink started. When the reward stopped, use dropped back to a large share. Turning the reward on again pushed use up to a large share. The pattern shows the drink, not chance, drove the change.

After the final reward phase ended, the researchers watched one more week. Belt use fell to a large share again, proving the incentive did not create lasting habits.

03

How this fits with other research

Reed (1991) extended the same idea to Dutch military bases. They paired small prizes with police checks and saw belt use rise from a large share to a large share. The gain stuck best with young drivers, showing that adding mild enforcement can stretch a short-term token effect.

Elba et al. (2018) used an ABAB design in a gym instead of a parking lot. Signs plus easy-to-grab wipes boosted equipment cleaning the same way the soft drink boosted belt use. Both studies show a quick reversal when the antecedent or reward disappears.

Dukhayyil et al. (1973) tested kids in a lab and found choice plus immediate candy kept them on task longer. Haring et al. (1988) used immediate soda with adults in cars. Together they show that fast, small, consumable reinforcers work across ages and settings.

04

Why it matters

You can see big, fast gains when you tie a tiny, wanted item directly to the target act. The catch: the item must be delivered right away and must stay cheap. Plan for the fade from day one—pair the reward with praise, then thin the schedule, or add prompts like Reed (1991) did. If you run community safety projects, think pop-up incentives plus signs or enforcement so the behavior has a chance to survive after the soda stops.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one cheap, immediate item (coffee coupon, high-five, sticker) and deliver it only when you see the target safety behavior, then track the data across on/off days.

02At a glance

Intervention
token economy
Design
reversal abab
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Safety belt use was observed at one restaurant during McDonald's "Make It Click" promotional campaign. Following baseline, the program was monitored without intervention. During the final 2 weeks of the campaign an incentive strategy was added providing a large soft drink contingent on safety belt use. Safety belt use did not change from baseline levels before the incentive phase. The rate of belt use increased under contingent reward and declined during follow-up. The effects of a verbal prompt could not be assessed because of the almost nonexistent use of the "Make It Click" stickers throughout the study.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1988 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-277