Teaching idiom comprehension to children with mental retardation.
Story-plus-picture selection quickly teaches idioms to kids with ID, but check expressive use on its own.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four children with intellectual disability joined a small class.
Each child listened to short stories that each held one idiom.
After the story the child picked the picture that showed what the idiom really meant.
The team tracked correct picks across days using a multiple-baseline design.
What they found
Every child started near zero and then climbed to high accuracy.
Most kids kept the skill weeks later and picked the right picture in new stories.
Using the idiom out loud was harder; expressive gains were mixed.
How this fits with other research
Garcia et al. (1973) taught sentence grammar to one girl with ID using drills and candy.
Chandler et al. (1992) show you can move from dry drills to rich stories and still win.
Sanders et al. (1989) found pictures slowed sound-blending for kids with ID.
Here, pictures helped because the task was picking meaning, not making sounds.
Lacroix et al. (2010) saw teens with Williams syndrome stay stuck on idioms even after years of talk therapy.
Their negative result warns us that general ID teaching may not fit every syndrome.
Why it matters
You now have a cheap, fast way to teach figurative language.
Write or find a 3-sentence story, drop the idiom in the last line, and show two pictures.
Ask the learner to point to the one that matches the hidden meaning.
Track daily, then test with brand-new stories to be sure the skill travels.
If you need spoken use, add a separate production phase; receptive success does not guarantee spoken use.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one idiom, write a micro-story, prepare two pictures, and start a daily 5-trial receptive probe.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of a training program designed to teach children with mild mental retardation the meaning of 12 idiomatic phrases, such as "to hit the sack." Four 9-year-old children participated in the training. A multiple baseline design across subjects and across three sets of idioms was implemented. Training consisted of presenting both literal and idiomatic contexts in the form of story narratives, and asking the children to explain the outcome of the story and to select one picture from an array of four that represented the outcome. All children demonstrated learning, although 1 child required review procedures to facilitate maintenance. Children were able to generalize their receptive learning to an expressive task with varying levels of success. All children demonstrated an ability to understand the learned idioms when presented in unfamiliar contexts.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-181