ABA Fundamentals

Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.

Dougherty et al. (1991) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1991
★ The Verdict

Horses follow the same stimulus-control rules as rats and pigeons—discrimination and peak shift work the same in the barn and the lab.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching new discriminations to clients in non-traditional settings or with large animals.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only work with humans and already trust generalization data from standard lab species.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers taught three horses to press a panel for grain. They used a light cue to signal when presses paid off. Next they added a second light that looked slightly different. Only one light still led to grain. The horses had to learn which was which.

After the horses chose the correct light every time, the team tested new lights. These lights varied in tiny steps between the trained ones. They wanted to see if the horses would still press when the light was close, but not exact.

02

What they found

The horses picked the correct light almost every time. When tested with the in-between lights, they pressed most for a light that was even further from the non-paying cue. This 'peak shift' matches what pigeons and rats do.

The data show horses build stimulus control the same way smaller lab animals do. Size and species did not change the basic rules.

03

How this fits with other research

Hendry et al. (1969) showed that old cues can block new ones from gaining control. They first trained rats with a noise cue, then added a light. The light never gained power because the noise had already 'claimed' the job. Davison et al. (1991) did the opposite: they let the new cue win. The difference is timing. Blocking happens when the first cue is already strong. Peak shift happens after the animal has learned both cues and you test in-between versions.

Burgess et al. (1971) mixed two cues that told rats to press at different speeds. The rats settled on a middle speed. M et al. found a different kind of middle: the horses shifted their peak away from the bad cue. Both studies show animals do not average cues blindly; the payoff history tells them how to respond.

Baer (1974) tracked how stimulus control flips during fixed-interval schedules. Early in the interval the same light slowed pressing; late in the interval it sped pressing. That paper shows context can flip control. The horse study adds that even simple discrimination can push the peak of responding away from the non-reinforced cue.

04

Why it matters

If you work with larger animals or in equine-assisted programs, you can trust basic ABA teaching rules. Use clear SDs, reinforce consistently, and expect peak shift when you probe generalization. The horse data say you do not need rat or pigeon labs to check your procedures; the laws hold across barn and clinic alike.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

When you probe generalization after a discrimination program, plot responding across stimulus values—look for a peak shift away from the S-delta to confirm clean stimulus control.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Using horses, we investigated three aspects of the stimulus control of lever-pressing behavior: stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift. Nine solid black circles, ranging in size from 0.5 in. to 4.5 in. (1.3 cm to 11.4 cm) served as stimuli. Each horse was shaped, using successive approximations, to press a rat lever with its lip in the presence of a positive stimulus, the 2.5-in. (6.4-cm) circle. Shaping proceeded quickly and was comparable to that of other laboratory organisms. After responding was maintained on a variable-interval 30-s schedule, stimulus generalization gradients were collected from 2 horses prior to discrimination training. During discrimination training, grain followed lever presses in the presence of a positive stimulus (a 2.5-in circle) and never followed lever presses in the presence of a negative stimulus (a 1.5-in. [3.8-cm] circle). Three horses met a criterion of zero responses to the negative stimulus in fewer than 15 sessions. Horses given stimulus generalization testing prior to discrimination training produced symmetrical gradients; horses given discrimination training prior to generalization testing produced asymmetrical gradients. The peak of these gradients shifted away from the negative stimulus. These results are consistent with discrimination, stimulus generalization, and peak-shift phenomena observed in other organisms.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1991 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-97