ABA Fundamentals

Signalled free-operant avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

De Moraes et al. (1977) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1977
★ The Verdict

Warning length decides whether avoidance looks orderly or chaotic—short signals act like no signal at all.

✓ Read this if BCBAs designing avoidance or safety-response paradigms with animals or humans.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with purely reinforcement-based plans and no avoidance components.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers worked with pigeons that could peck a key to delay electric shocks.

A warning light came on before shock periods. The team varied how long the light stayed on.

They watched whether birds pecked more during the warning or during safe periods.

02

What they found

Birds pecked fastest when the warning light was on.

Short warning lights made pecking look like unsignaled avoidance.

The signal length changed how the birds acted, not just whether a signal existed.

03

How this fits with other research

Shimp et al. (1971) showed pigeons prefer signaled over unsignaled avoidance. The new study adds that even signaled avoidance can act like unsignaled if the signal is too brief.

Dove et al. (1974) proved key pecks trained with food can switch to shock avoidance. Lobb et al. (1977) now shows those same pecks come under tight stimulus control once the avoidance is running.

Tager-Flusberg (1981) later used brief keylights for food reinforcement and saw respondent pecking. The 1977 shock study mirrors this, showing brief signals evoke quick responses no matter the reinforcer type.

04

Why it matters

If you use warning stimuli in treatment or animal training, keep the signal long enough for the learner to notice and act. Ultra-brief cues may erase the safety value of the signal and drive frantic, unsignaled-like responding. Test duration in your own setup and watch for response bursts that look uncontrolled.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Lengthen your warning cue to at least three seconds and count responses; if rate spikes, the cue is still too brief.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Two pigeons were trained to peck a key under a free-operant avoidance schedule. Then, changes in key color signalled the beginning (safe period) and the end (warning period) of the response-shock interval, with a response required to change the key color. Finally, a change in key color signalled the warning period and either a response or a shock reinstated the safe stimulus. During signalled avoidance, response rate was higher during the warning stimulus than during the safe stimulus. More responding tended to occur in the warning stimulus when it was terminated by either a response or a shock than by only a response. In either procedure, response latency during the warning stimulus was a function of the duration of the warning stimulus. In general, response and shock rate were higher during unsignalled than during signalled avoidance. When the warning stimulus was brief, the results were similar to those of unsignalled avoidance. These results confirm previous findings with pigeons, are in general agreement with data provided by other species in studies of signalled avoidance, and thereby indicate the transituationality of the key-pecking operant.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.27-281