ABA Fundamentals

Shock-induced aggression as a function of prior experience with avoidance, fighting, or unavoidable shock.

Powell et al. (1972) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1972
★ The Verdict

Past lessons about control and winning shape how hard an animal fights when shocked.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing behavior plans for clients with escape or aggression histories.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only treat skill deficits without problem behavior.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with rats. Each rat first lived in a different world.

Some rats learned to press a lever to avoid shocks. Others learned to win fights. A third group got shocks they could not escape.

Later every rat met a partner in a cage. The researchers gave both animals brief shocks. They counted how often the rats attacked each other.

02

What they found

Rats that had learned avoidance or had won fights before now started fights faster and kept fighting longer.

Rats that had only received inescapable shock rarely fought back. Their past learning changed how they acted when pain hit.

03

How this fits with other research

Sachs et al. (1969) showed that shock can also stop fights if one rat is drugged or naturally calm. The 1972 paper flips the coin: history can make fighting rise.

Azrin et al. (1967) proved that pigeons will peck and attack on purpose when food comes on a fixed-interval schedule. Together these studies say aggression is not just reflexive; it can be strengthened or weakened by past consequences.

Hymowitz et al. (1974) found that only shocks the animal cannot control will cut schedule-induced drinking. The same rule appears here: uncontrollable shock lowers later fighting, while controllable shock (avoidance training) raises it.

04

Why it matters

Your client’s learning history sets the stage for new behavior. If a child has learned that escape or assertive acts work, stressful moments may trigger bigger responses. Build new, useful escape and assertive skills in safe drills now. Then, when real stress shows up, the old fight pattern is less likely to take over.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run five easy escape trials for a task the client dislikes, then probe for aggression during the next tough demand—watch if the brief escape history lowers escalation.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
other
Population
other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Rats were trained in shock-induced aggression, free operant avoidance, or were presented with unavoidable shocks. Fighting in response to shock was subsequently measured by intermatching individual animals that had received the three training procedures. The fighting probabilities of animals with histories of avoidance and dominant animals with histories of fighting were higher than the fighting probabilities of non-dominant fighting rats or rats with a history of unavoidable shocks. Animals with higher fighting probabilities disrupted avoidance baselines more than animals with lower fighting probabilities. Control experiments suggested that fighting decrements produced by administration of prior grid-shock were due to the acquisition of behaviors incompatible with aggression.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.18-323