ABA Fundamentals

Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm.

Grosch et al. (1981) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1981
★ The Verdict

Pigeons copy children's delay-choice patterns, proving self-control is driven by the setting, not the species.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching delay tolerance or self-management to clients who grab small reinforcers too soon.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on severe problem behavior with no delay component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers put pigeons in a Mischel-type test. Birds picked between one pellet now or four pellets later.

They added toys, extra keys, and changed wait times. The setup copied the famous marshmallow test for kids.

02

What they found

Pigeons acted like preschoolers. They waited longer when toys were present and when they could peck an empty key.

Past wins or losses also shifted their choice. The same cues that guide kids guided birds.

03

How this fits with other research

Lane et al. (1984) ran the same pigeon test but let birds switch mid-delay. Many did, so the 1981 study may have overstated self-control.

Logue et al. (1986) moved the test to adult women. All picked the bigger-later reward, showing humans can out-wait pigeons.

Repp et al. (1992) gave the choice to kids. Children who waited showed slow, steady fixed-interval pecking, linking one choice style to later work patterns.

04

Why it matters

The pigeon data tell you that self-control is situational, not a trait. Toys, side tasks, and past wins can nudge clients to wait for bigger reinforcers. When you design delay-tolerance programs, build in those same environmental supports.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a quiet fidget or a neutral task near the waiting area to help clients stick with the larger delayed reinforcer.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Walter Mischel studied self-control in preschool children in the following manner: if the child waited for an interval to end, he or she received the more preferred of two reinforcers; if the child responded to terminate the interval by ringing a bell, the less preferred reinforcer was given. We used an analogous procedure to study self-control in pigeons: if the bird waited for a trial to end, it received the more preferred reinforcer; if the bird terminated the trial by pecking a key, the less preferred reinforcer was given. We explored the effects on self-control of a number of variables analogous to those studied by Mischel and co-workers, e.g., presence versus absence of reinforcers, of alternative responses, and of stimuli during the wait interval; prior experience of the subjects; and test paradigm. The results obtained with pigeons paralleled the results obtained by Mischel with human children.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1981.35-3