Reduction of intraspecies aggression in rats by positive reinforcement of incompatible behaviors.
Rewarding calm, safe behavior can slash aggression by more than half, even when the trigger is still present.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with pairs of rats in a small cage. Each pair got short electric shocks that normally make rats attack each other.
After each shock the researchers gave food to the rat that did NOT fight. They repeated this many times and then stopped to see if fighting returned.
The design is called ABAB: baseline, treatment, back to baseline, treatment again.
What they found
When food came for calm behavior the chance of fighting dropped sharply. The same drop happened every time the food program returned.
Even under painful shocks the rats chose food over fighting once the lesson was clear.
How this fits with other research
Barlow et al. (2015) later showed the same idea works in a shelter. Dogs that barked and jumped stopped when staff gave treats for quiet standing.
Cohen (1975) found that rats housed together for 28 days also fought less after shocks. Housing helps, but teaching a food-rewarded replacement skill works faster.
Navarick et al. (1972) noted that shocked rats sometimes bite the metal lever instead of the other rat. Their paper warns us to watch what we measure, but it does not clash with the new finding — it just shows another form of shock-elicited aggression.
Why it matters
You can cut aggression by rewarding any calm behavior that cannot happen at the same time as the problem act. The reward does not have to be big or special; food, toys, or even brief social praise can work. Try it next time a client hits during demands: stop the task, wait two seconds of calm hands, then hand a favorite snack and resume. The rat data say the effect will show up fast and return if you stop, so keep the plan in place.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one calm response that cannot occur while the client hits; reinforce that response with a bite of preferred food every time it happens during a normally tough activity.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Fighting responses were elicited by response-independent shocks delivered to pairs of rats. Food pellets were presented following different non-fighting responses to shock: some pairs of rats received pellets dependent upon a specific non-fighting response to shock; others received pellets dependent upon any non-fighting response to shock; and control pairs never received pellets. The mean probability of an elicited aggressive response to shock was reduced to 0.2 by food reinforcement for a specific non-fighting response, and to 0.5 by food reinforcement for any kind of non-fighting response. These values contrasted with the 0.8 probability of elicited aggression when pairs of rats received no food reinforcement. Consistent findings were obtained when treatment conditions were changed for individual pairs of rats.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.18-535