ABA Fundamentals

Improving in-kennel presentation of shelter dogs through response-dependent and response-independent treat delivery.

Protopopova et al. (2015) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2015
★ The Verdict

Handing out free treats on a timer calms shelter dogs just as well as a DRO schedule.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping shelters or boarding kennels cut barking and jumping.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work with human clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Shelter dogs often bark and jump when people walk past their kennels. Barlow et al. (2015) tested two quick ways to calm this down. Staff either dropped treats on a fixed timer (no dog response needed) or used a DRO plan that paid the dog for quiet moments.

The team watched the same dogs across all conditions and counted barks and jumps.

02

What they found

Both tricks worked. Barking and jumping dropped well below baseline. The dogs acted about the same no matter which plan staff used.

03

How this fits with other research

Navarick et al. (1972) first showed the idea in rats: pay for any response that cannot happen while fighting, and aggression falls. Alexandra’s team moved the same logic from lab rats to real shelter dogs.

Horner-Johnson et al. (2002) found that matching how often you ask for responses to how often the learner naturally responds cuts stereotypy. Alexandra matched treat timing to staff walk-bys and got a similar drop in kennel stereotypies.

McGonigle et al. (2014) taught volunteers to run sit-down drills with dogs. That study needed tight staff fidelity. Alexandra’s method is looser—just hand out treats—yet still improves behavior, so shelters with less-trained helpers can still win.

04

Why it matters

You can calm kennel chaos without fancy protocols. Pair staff with a pouch of kibble and a timer. Noncontingent treats work as well as DRO and take zero data sheets. Try it on your next walk-through and give every dog a quiet boost.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Clip a treat pouch, set a phone timer for 30 s, and feed every dog you pass whether they are quiet or not.

02At a glance

Intervention
differential reinforcement
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

In a sequence of studies, we evaluated 2 behavioral interventions designed to decrease undesirable in-kennel behaviors of shelter dogs. In Experiment 1, we compared the efficacy of a simple pairing of person with food (response-independent treat delivery) to an increasing interval differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (DRO) procedure and a control condition. Both procedures decreased the median percentage of undesirable behavior from baseline (88.13%, interquartile range [IQR] = 52.78% and 66.43%, IQR = 89.06% respectively), and the control condition increased behavior by 15.13% (IQR = 32.08%), H(2) = 6.49, p = .039. In Experiment 2, we assessed the efficacy of a response-independent procedure on the whole shelter population. We found a 68% decrease from baseline in the number of dogs that behaved undesirably (U = -4.16, p < .001). Our results suggest that a response-independent procedure is equivalent in efficacy to a DRO procedure to decrease undesirable in-kennel behavior of shelter dogs.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jaba.217