ABA Fundamentals

Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for edibles.

Kern et al. (2006) · Behavior modification 2006
★ The Verdict

Teach kids to swap non-food items for a bite of food to cut pica fast.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating pica in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose clients already use full multi-component packages.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Two children with developmental disabilities kept eating non-food items. The team taught a simple swap. Hand over the rock or paper; get a bite of cookie in return.

Sessions ran in a clinic room. Trainers waited for pica attempts, then cued the exchange. They praised each trade and gave a small edible.

02

What they found

Pica dropped fast when the kids could trade. The swap kept working weeks later. One child needed extra practice to use the skill in new rooms.

03

How this fits with other research

Frank‐Crawford et al. (2025) later tested a fuller package with 33 clients. Their 90 % drop in pica supersedes this tiny 2006 study and shows the exchange idea scales up.

Ruckle et al. (2023) ran a conceptual replication. Instead of trading for food, kids tossed pica items into a trash can and got praise. Pica still fell, proving the magic is the replacement response, not the cookie itself.

Ledford et al. (2019) extended the swap idea to a preschool playground. Teachers gave attention, not food, for handing over items. Pica stayed low, showing the reinforcer can change as long as the response stays easy.

04

Why it matters

You can start tiny. Teach one clear trade: item in hand, edible in mouth. Watch the data; if pica dips, keep the swap and fade the food later. If it spreads, add extra settings or people. The 2025 case series gives you a roadmap when you are ready to build a full program.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Place a preferred edible in reach and prompt the client to hand you the pica item; deliver the food and praise the trade.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
developmental delay
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Assessment results indicated that pica exhibited by two boys with developmental disabilitieswas not associated with environmental contingencies. Consistent with previous research, an oral stimulation function was hypothesized. A related intervention that taught participants to exchange inedible items for edibles was developed. Findings showed that the intervention resulted in reductions in pica for both participants. When the interventionwas introduced across settings, reductions in pica were observed for one participant. However, additional training with alternative pica itemswas necessary to produce reductions in pica across settings with the second participant. Reductions in pica were maintained as the intervention was systematically thinned.

Behavior modification, 2006 · doi:10.1177/0145445505283414