Reducing latency of a child's responding to instructions by means of a token system.
A simple token board cut response time for everyday commands in one 8-year-old.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One 8-year-old boy kept dragging his feet when told to do things. The team set up a token board. Each quick response earned a plastic chip. Five chips bought five minutes of play time.
They tested five everyday commands like 'Put the toys away.' A multiple-baseline design showed the tokens were really doing the work.
What they found
Four of the five commands got faster. Latency dropped as soon as tokens started. When tokens stopped, the boy slowed again. Tokens came back and speed returned.
How this fits with other research
Azrin et al. (1969) ran a similar system with a whole class of students with intellectual disability. Their token board raised hand-raising and quiet sitting. Fjellstedt et al. (1973) zooms in on one child and clocks how fast he moves.
McLaughlin et al. (1972) used tokens to cut talk-outs in a fifth-grade room. They saw big drops the same year N et al. saw big speed-ups. Same tool, different target — no conflict, just wider use.
Andzik et al. (2022) brought tokens to kids with autism who escape work. Tokens plus short breaks slashed problem behavior. The 1973 study planted the seed; 2022 shows the tree still bears fruit.
Why it matters
You don’t need fancy gear. A jar of poker chips and a sticky note chart can turn ‘five-minute stand-offs’ into ‘five-second starts.’ Try it first for transitions or clean-up. Watch the clock, not just yes/no, and you’ll see change fast.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one slow transition, hand a token for each quick start, and let 5 tokens buy 5 min of iPad.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The response latency of following directions by an 8-yr-old boy from a class for emotionally disturbed children was modified by the contingent application of a token system. To demonstrate reinforcer effectiveness, a multiple baseline approach was used. Measures were obtained for the time elapsed between the presentation of verbal directions and five performances: (1) entering the experimental room, (2) putting toys away, (3) beginning academic work, (4) putting toys away again, and (5) returning to the classroom and completing preparations for leaving school. These five measures were placed on the token system at three different times. The results demonstrated that four of the five performances were clearly affected by the token system as their response latency for following directions decreased substantially.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1973 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-125