Pattern‐setting for improving risky decision‐making
A tiny forced streak of picks can instantly steer college students toward the better gamble.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Arfer (2023) asked college students to pick between two gambles on a computer. Some trials forced the students to repeat their last pick. Then they got free-choice trials again.
The goal was to see if a short pattern of forced picks would nudge later free choices toward the better gamble.
What they found
Students who had the forced-repetition phase picked the higher-value gamble more often on the next free trials. The boost showed up right away, not slowly.
The pattern-setting worked like a quick shove, not a long lesson.
How this fits with other research
Ono (2004) saw the opposite force: pigeons picked the option they had NOT just used. The bird data seem to clash, but the tasks differ. Koichi looked at preference after long exposure, while Arfer used only a few forced trials. Short pushes can nudge; long exposure can satiate.
Carr et al. (2002) showed pigeons ditch old patterns when food locations change without warning. Arfer adds a twist: you can CREATE a brief pattern that humans will then ditch in the right direction.
Miranda-Dukoski et al. (2014) found that brief key-color cues helped pigeons track shifting reward odds. Arfer’s short forced picks act like a human cue, snapping attention back to the better gamble.
Why it matters
If you run choice sessions with adults or teens, try inserting two or three forced trials of the safer option before free choice. The quick pattern may momentarily tilt decisions without extra tokens or lectures. Keep the forced run brief; the effect fades if you overuse it.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Before a risky-choice game, lock in two correct responses to create a quick pattern, then switch to free choice.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Self-control can be defined as making choices in accordance with long-term, rather than short-term, patterns of behavior. Rachlin (2016) suggested a novel technique to enhance self-control, by which individual choices carry the weight of a larger pattern of choices. This report describes a study of 169 college students who made repeated choices between two gambles. The better of the two gambles had a greater win probability but required waiting an uncertain amount of time. Some "patterned" subjects were forced to repeat their previous choices according to a schedule, while control subjects could choose freely on every trial. It was found that on free-choice trials, the patterned subjects chose the better gamble more often than controls. There was stronger evidence for such an effect appearing immediately than for it developing gradually from a process of learning over the course of the task. An additional condition in which subjects were forced to choose the better gamble yielded inconsistent results. Overall, the results support the use of pattern-setting as a strategy to improve decision-making.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2023 · doi:10.1002/jeab.816