ABA Fundamentals

Multiple Schedules of Time-Correlated Reinforcement.

Hearst (1960) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1960
★ The Verdict

Brief, clock-based reinforcement windows can create ratio-style response bursts without ever counting responses.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who thin reinforcement schedules or shape high-rate academic responding.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use simple continuous reinforcement.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Hearst (1960) built a new kind of schedule. Instead of waiting for a set number of presses or a set time, the machine delivered food during short windows that came and went on a clock. The windows were brief and repeated in a pattern.

The animal could press at any time, but only presses inside the window paid off. No ratio or interval rule was ever in force. The goal was to see if these time windows alone could create the same response patterns we see on true ratio or interval schedules.

02

What they found

Without ever asking for a fixed number of presses, the rats still produced the fast burst typical of ratio schedules. The pattern looked like FR even though the schedule never counted responses.

The study showed that brief, clock-based reinforcement windows can generate both interval and ratio response shapes. Schedule control does not always need the usual ratio or interval definition.

03

How this fits with other research

Mechner (1958) had described FR bursts in theory two years earlier, but only as a rule-based schedule. Hearst (1960) later proved the same burst can appear when the only rule is a short time window, updating the field’s view of what creates ratio patterns.

Kelley et al. (2023) recently used the same window idea in therapy. They signaled brief “reinforcement available” periods at the start of noncontingent reinforcement so clients could tell when praise was free. Thinning went faster and problem behavior stayed low, showing the 1960 lab trick still works with children in clinics.

Mazur (1983) later ran steady FR and RR schedules and found the burst rate stays the same across ratio types. This supports Hearst (1960): the burst is a core ratio trait, whether the schedule is true ratio or time-correlated.

04

Why it matters

You can use brief, signaled time windows to shape ratio-like responding without counting responses. In treatment, this means you can thin reinforcement quickly by telling the client “points are only available during this short green light.” In skill teaching, you can create fast, steady work bursts by delivering praise in short, predictable windows instead of after every fifth response. The schedule feels ratio to the learner, but you avoid strict ratio requirements that might evoke ratio strain.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 5-second green card at the start of each NCR interval and deliver praise only while the card is showing.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

have shown that behavior typical of both interval and ratio schedules can be observed within a framework of time-correlated reinforcement schedules which are not defined with reference to response "counts" or "ratios." In these studies a response was reinforced only during a restricted time period, tD,2 which itself was programmed on a fixed-interval schedule. For example, a tD of I second might be re-'Now at NIMH CNRC. William A. White Building, Saiint Elizabeths

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1960 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1960.3-49