ABA Fundamentals

Modification of nasal resonance in cleft-palate children by informative feedback.

Roll (1973) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1973
★ The Verdict

A blinking light tied to nasal vibration can cut hypernasal speech in half within minutes for kids with cleft palate.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with articulation or resonance goals in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving only fluent speakers or adults with no resonance issues.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Two kids with cleft palate spoke into a microphone. A tiny light blinked every time their nose vibrated too much.

The light was the only feedback. No treats, no praise, just the blink. The study flipped the light on and off in an ABAB design.

02

What they found

When the light was on, hypernasal sounds dropped by half. When it was off, the old nasal voice came right back.

Both kids fixed their speech in minutes, not weeks. The change was big and immediate.

03

How this fits with other research

Stasolla et al. (2013) used a microswitch-to-toy setup for kids with cerebral palsy. Both studies show a simple sensor-to-output loop can create fast behavior change.

Robertson et al. (2013) gave nonverbal clients a microswitch phone. Like Macdonald (1973), the tech gave immediate feedback and the users took off with almost no training.

Bacon et al. (1998) cut disruptive behavior with noncontingent escape. Both papers help speech-delayed kids, but one uses feedback and the other uses free breaks.

04

Why it matters

You can build this light box for under twenty dollars. Clip the sensor to the child’s nose bridge, plug in the LED, and start practice. No extra staff, no tokens, no data sheets during the trial. If you serve kids with repaired cleft palate, try the light feedback first before adding heavier interventions.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tape a small LED to a USB microphone, set the sound trigger to nasal frequencies, and let the child practice speech while watching the light.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
2
Population
other
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

Vibration of the walls of the nasal cavities during production of an English vowel or diphthong defined a hypernasal response. A crystal transducer on one side of the nose activated a voice-operated relay when vibration exceeded an arbitrary limit to provide an apparatus definition of the response. During training sessions, responses without nasal vibration turned on a white light in the sound-treated chamber. Subject 1 had a repaired cleft palate and mild hypernasal speech. Introduction of the differential feedback, reversal, and reinstatement of the feedback conditions resulted in a rapid decrease, increase, and decrease in percentage of nasalized productions of the /eI/ sound Subject 2 had a cleft of the soft palate and severe hypernasal speech. Introduction of feedback produced a gradual decline in the percentage of hypernasal productions of the /##/ sound over 22 sessions. Removal and reinstatement of feedback resulted in a rapid increase and decrease respectively in the percentage of nasalized responses.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1973 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-397