Measuring context–response associations that drive habits
Repetition wires context cues to responses so tightly that behavior runs without thought.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Labrecque et al. (2024) asked adults to press keys when they saw colored squares.
The squares were the context. The key press was the response.
People practiced the task many times. Later, the team blocked their goal memory. They wanted to see if the habit still ran.
What they found
More practice made the cue-response link stronger.
Even when people forgot the goal, the habit kept going. Automatic success rose with repetition.
How this fits with other research
Sutphin et al. (1998) showed how to break habits with habit reversal. Labrecque shows how to measure the strength of those habits first.
Sullivan et al. (2020) saw old responses pop back after extinction. Labrecque finds the same automatic pop-back, but during ongoing practice, not relapse.
Rapport et al. (1982) proved pigeons can use their own past moves as cues. Labrecque extends this to humans and calls it a context-response habit.
Why it matters
You now have a lab yardstick for habit strength. Use it to test if your treatment weakens the cue-response link, not just the top behavior. After many trials, watch for automatic slips even when the client “knows better.” Add practice checks that block the goal prompt to see if the habit still fires.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →After ten practice rounds, remove the goal direction for two trials and record if the response still happens.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
People achieve important life outcomes of health, financial security, and productivity by repeating operant behavior. To identify whether such operants reflect goal pursuit or habit, the present research introduces a new paradigm that yields objective measures of learning and controls for the motivations of goal pursuit. In two experiments, participants practiced a sequential task of making sushi and then completed a test of the strength of cue-response (habit) associations in memory. Finally, they repeated the sushi task without instructions while under cognitive load (designed to impede deliberation about goals). As predicted, greater task practice yielded stronger cue-response associations, which in turn promoted task success. Practice did not improve performance by enhancing goal intentions or other task motivations. We conclude that repetition facilitates performance by creating mental associations that automatically activate practiced, habitual responses upon perception of recurring context cues.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2024 · doi:10.1002/jeab.893