Joint control and the generalization of selection-based verbal behavior.
Generalized matching rests on self-talk; build spoken words first, then let them guide pointing.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Lowenkron (1991) wrote a theory paper. He asked: why can a child hear a new word once and later point to the right picture?
He said the answer is not simple if-then rules. Instead, two verbal acts happen at the same time. The child silently says the word and also hears herself. When both match the picture, she points. He called this moment joint control.
He argued that you need spoken words first. Without them, the child cannot talk to herself inside her head.
What they found
The paper does not give data. It gives a new story: selection-based tasks only work when the learner already has spoken words.
Joint control is the bridge that lets old spoken skills guide new pointing or matching.
How this fits with other research
Hozella et al. (2022) later tested the idea with five students with autism. They taught the kids to whisper the steps of a job. All students learned to pick the right items and finish the task. This real-life test shows the 1991 idea can be used in classrooms.
Vosters et al. (2020) asked: is the silent talk really needed? They blocked speech by asking people to hum. Visual tasks fell apart, but tactile tasks did not. This means joint control matters more for pictures than for touch. The lab result sharpens the 1991 claim.
Petursdottir et al. (2023) update the old picture. They say today we should worry less about speak-vs-point and more about icon size, array clutter, and how much a symbol looks like its referent. Their paper keeps the 1991 engine but swaps the road map.
Why it matters
If a learner cannot match new pictures to words, first check spoken skills. Teach the child to echo, name, and self-cue. Then use that inner voice to drive selection tasks. This order can save weeks of trial-and-error drills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Have the learner quietly repeat the instruction before each selection trial; fade the voice to a whisper, then to a lip move, and watch if accuracy holds.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Although the acquisition of selection-based verbal behavior can be ascribed to the acquisition of a conditional discrimination, such an account cannot explain any generalization of the behavior to novel verbal stimuli. The problem is that printed and spoken words and phrases do not vary on continuous dimensions that would support stimulus generalization. Both conceptual analysis and empirical evidence suggest that an alternate form of stimulus control, joint control, can more readily account for acquisition and generalization of these performances. The fact that joint control depends on topography-based behavior implies that generalized selection-based behavior is not an alternative to topography-based behavior but depends on its prior development.
The Analysis of verbal behavior, 1991 · doi:10.1007/BF03392866