Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation.
Intimacy is just reinforced vulnerability—track it like any other operant.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Temple et al. (2001) wrote a theory paper. They asked, "What is intimacy from a behavior-analyst view?"
They said intimacy is not magic. It is one person showing vulnerable behavior and the other person reinforcing it.
The paper lists no kids, no trials, no data. It is a map for future experiments.
What they found
The authors found a new way to talk about love. When you share a secret and your partner smiles, you are more likely to share again.
If your partner laughs or walks away, the sharing drops. Reinforcement and punishment shape closeness, just like any other behavior.
How this fits with other research
Schmitt (1984) came first. That paper showed how cooperation grows when partners deliver cheap, clear rewards. Temple et al. (2001) take the same idea and aim it at romantic vulnerability.
Mueller et al. (2000) push us to study private events. Temple et al. (2001) answer by turning the private act of "opening up" into a visible, countable operant.
Rose et al. (2000) add establishing operations—why today, not yesterday, you crave closeness. Temple et al. (2001) leave EOs out, so future work can bolt that piece on.
Why it matters
You can use this lens in social-skills groups. Track when a client shares, note the peer response, and reinforce kind replies. Over weeks, vulnerable bids should rise and friendships deepen. The paper gives you a clean, measurable definition of intimacy you can program and graph.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Count one client’s "personal share" bids per session and deliver praise when peers respond kindly.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This paper proposes that intimacy is a process that emerges from a sequence of events in which behavior vulnerable to interpersonal punishment is reinforced by the response of another person. These intimate events result in an increase in the probability of behavior vulnerable to interpersonal punishment in the presence of the reinforcing partner. The process results in intimate partnership formation and reports of feeling intimate. In addition to positing an operant process integrating the various components of intimacy, the theory also posits that the punishment of interpersonally vulnerable behavior is an integral aspect of intimate partnership formation and that intimate partnerships can develop that reinforce behavior that may be destructive both to the individual and to others.
The Behavior analyst, 2001 · doi:10.1007/BF03392020