Habit and persistence
Habits aren't locked in; shift the context and they weaken like any other behavior.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bouton (2024) looked at decades of animal and human data. He asked: do habits really stick forever once they form?
He focused on studies that first train a behavior, then make the reward worthless. If the behavior keeps going, we call it a habit.
What they found
The review found habits are not steel-hard. They drop off fast when the place, cues, or task change.
So a habit is less 'permanent' and more 'automatic-but-picky' about where it shows up.
How this fits with other research
Aggarwal et al. (2026) saw the same thing in a kids' clinic. About one-third of children showed renewal of problem behavior when the room, task, or staff changed. Their real-world numbers back Bouton's lab story.
Browning et al. (2018) first showed this with rats. When a peer rat left or returned, lever pressing came back. Social context alone was enough to trigger renewal.
Michael (1974) gave an early lab proof. A stimulus only kept its reinforcing power while the surrounding schedule stayed the same. Once the schedule flipped, the stimulus lost value overnight. Bouton's review ties these dots together.
Why it matters
For BCBAs, the message is practical: don't fear habits as unbreakable. Change the context—move seats, swap teachers, alter the task—and the 'stubborn' behavior often drops all by itself. Plan for renewal, then use context shifts as part of your intervention toolkit.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Try a quick context change—new seat, different room, or switch to a fresh task—and measure if the 'habit' drops.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Voluntary behaviors (operants) can come in two varieties: Goal-directed actions, which are emitted based on the remembered value of the reinforcer, and habits, which are evoked by antecedent cues and performed without the reinforcer’s value in active memory. The two are perhaps most clearly distinguished with the reinforcer-devaluation test: Goal-directed actions are suppressed when the reinforcer is separately devalued and responding is tested in extinction, but habitual behaviors are not. But what is the function of habit learning? Habits are often thought to be strong and unusually persistent. The present selective review examines this idea by asking whether habits identified by the reinforcer-devaluation test are more resistant to extinction, resistant to the effects of other contingency change, vulnerable to relapse, resistant to the weakening effects of context change, or permanently in place once they are learned. Surprisingly little evidence supports the idea that habits are permanent or more persistent. Habits are more context-specific than goal-directed actions are. Methods that make behavior persistent do not necessarily work by encouraging habit. The function of habit learning may not be to make a behavior strong or more persistent but to make it automatic and efficient in a particular context.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2024 · doi:10.1002/jeab.894