ABA Fundamentals

Generalization of a tactile stimulus in horses.

Dougherty et al. (1993) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1993
★ The Verdict

Stimulus generalization gradients look the same in horses as in rats and pigeons—response strength falls off smoothly with distance from the trained tactile cue.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who train non-human animals or use tactile cues with any client.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work on verbal or social skills with human learners.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with horses in a barn lab. They first taught each horse to touch its nose to one spot on its neck when it felt a tiny vibration there. After the cue was solid, they tested new vibrations placed a finger-width away, then farther away, up and down the neck.

Each test was brief. The researchers simply counted how often the horses still touched the original spot when the buzz came from a new place. No food or praise was given during these checks, so the data show pure stimulus control.

02

What they found

Response strength dropped in a smooth line. The closer the test buzz was to the trained site, the more the horses responded; the farther away, the less they responded. The curve looked like the classic generalization gradient first drawn with rats and pigeons.

In short, horses treat a tactile cue the same way a rat treats a tone or a pigeon treats a color. The rule is distance equals decline.

03

How this fits with other research

WINOGRAD (1965) and SLOANE (1964) mapped the first orderly gradients in rats and pigeons decades earlier. Castañe et al. (1993) now show the same pattern holds in a large mammal, proving the principle is not tied to small lab animals.

Howard (1979) extends the idea to humans. People also show smooth gradients, but their curves are shaped by the words they use to label the stimuli. The horse study adds the tactile sense and a non-verbal species, filling a gap in the generalization map.

Grosch et al. (1981) show gradients can shift. When the reinforcement rule changes, the peak of responding moves away from the original cue. The horse data give a clean baseline for future shift tests with equine clients.

04

Why it matters

If you work with any non-human client—dog, parrot, or horse—expect responses to generalize in a tidy slope. Place your trained cue where you want the strongest behavior, then probe nearby sites to see the drop-off. This baseline lets you spot flattening (poor discrimination) or unwanted peak shift early. Next time you shape a tactile target, test a finger-width away first; the gradient you see will tell you how precise your stimulus control really is.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After you master a tactile target, probe one inch to each side and record response rate to see your gradient.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Using horses, we investigated the control of operant behavior by a tactile stimulus (the training stimulus) and the generalization of behavior to six other similar test stimuli. In a stall, the experimenters mounted a response panel in the doorway. Located on this panel were a response lever and a grain dispenser. The experimenters secured a tactile-stimulus belt to the horse's back. The stimulus belt was constructed by mounting seven solenoids along a piece of burlap in a manner that allowed each to provide the delivery of a tactile stimulus, a repetitive light tapping, at different locations (spaced 10.0 cm apart) along the horse's back. Two preliminary steps were necessary before generalization testing: training a measurable response (lip pressing) and training on several reinforcement schedules in the presence of a training stimulus (tapping by one of the solenoids). We then gave each horse two generalization test sessions. Results indicated that the horses' behavior was effectively controlled by the training stimulus. Horses made the greatest number of responses to the training stimulus, and the tendency to respond to the other test stimuli diminished as the stimuli became farther away from the training stimulus. These findings are discussed in the context of behavioral principles and their relevance to the training of horses.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1993 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-521