Further analysis of modifications to the three‐step guided compliance procedure to enhance compliance among children with autism
Hand the child a high-preference item at the same moment you give the first prompt in three-step guided compliance.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Two boys with autism kept saying no to adult requests. The team tried the usual three-step guided compliance: model, physically guide, then praise. Each step was given alone first. Nothing worked.
Next they paired the first prompt with a favorite toy or snack. One boy got bubbles, the other got chips. They still ran the three steps, but now the first prompt came with instant pay-off.
What they found
Compliance jumped for both kids only when the high-preference item was added. Guided compliance alone or differential reinforcement alone had failed.
The gains held even when the extra treat was later faded to praise only.
How this fits with other research
Storch et al. (2012) tried simpler tweaks—drop the model prompt, use 5-second gaps. It helped just one of three preschoolers; the other two still needed tangible rewards. Wilder’s 2020 study shows why: some kids with autism need the item up front, not later.
Planer et al. (2018) boosted compliance with high-probability request sequences. Wilder adds another tool: when high-p doesn’t fit, front-load the first guided-compliance prompt with a reinforcer instead.
Briere et al. (2025) also blended differential reinforcement and fading, but for nasal swabs. Together these papers say: pair the reinforcer with the scary first step, then fade—whether the task is a swab or a simple instruction.
Why it matters
If you have a client who ignores both guided compliance and token boards, try handing the favorite item right as you give the first prompt. Start with one trial, one item you know they love, and keep the three steps in place. You may see an immediate yes where you used to hear no.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one tough instruction, grab the child’s favorite snack, and deliver it with the first prompt—then run the usual three steps.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Three-step guided compliance (vocal prompt, vocal plus model prompt, vocal prompt plus physical guidance) is a commonly used procedure to increase compliance among children with intellectual disabilities. Previous research has suggested that under some conditions, slight modifications to the three-step procedure may enhance its effectiveness. These modifications include omitting the model prompt and decreasing the interprompt interval. In the current study, we evaluated another modification to the procedure: the delivery of a high-preference item contingent upon compliance with the first vocal prompt (i.e., differential reinforcement). For 2 participants with autism, compliance remained low when we implemented differential reinforcement and the guided compliance procedure in isolation. However, compliance improved when we combined differential reinforcement and the three-step guided procedure, suggesting that for at least some children, the combination of contingent access to a high-preference item and the guided compliance procedure is more effective than either intervention alone.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2020 · doi:10.1002/jaba.721