ABA Fundamentals

Establishing Multiple-Control Responding of Children with Autism to People and Emotions in Context by Utilizing Derived Stimulus Relations

O’Connor et al. (2020) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2020
★ The Verdict

Stimulus-equivalence training lets kids with autism link people, emotions, and places without extra drilling.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching emotion recognition or social context to children with autism.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only on rote motor or self-care skills.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

O’Connor et al. (2020) worked with three children with autism. They wanted to see if the kids could learn to match people with emotions and places without direct teaching.

The team used stimulus-equivalence training. They first taught simple matches like “Mom-happy-park.” Then they tested if the children could pick “Mom” when they only saw “happy” and “park” without ever being taught that exact trio.

02

What they found

All three kids mastered the trained links. Two of them immediately derived the new, untaught matches. The third child needed a quick correction program, then he got it too.

In plain words, the children could now look at a picture of a smiling face and point to the right person and place, even though that exact combination had never been drilled.

03

How this fits with other research

Fienup et al. (2017) showed that adults without autism also form these derived links, but only when the mastery rule is set to 12 correct trials in a row. O’Connor moves the same logic down to young children with autism and keeps the tight criterion, proving the method still works.

Dixon et al. (2018) used the PEAK curriculum to build similar derived language skills in adults with autism. O’Connor shortens the path: a brief equivalence protocol gives comparable gains in kids, so you don’t need a full curriculum for every goal.

Gwynette et al. (2020) got emergent verbal responses by slipping extra facts into mastered tasks. O’Connor gets emergent responses too, but through equivalence networks instead of instructive feedback. Both studies say the same thing: kids can learn more than you directly teach if you set the learning context right.

04

Why it matters

You can fold this protocol into social-skills or emotion-recognition programs. After a child masters “happy-Mom” and “Mom-park,” test if they can pick Mom when you just say “happy” and show the park. If they can’t, run a quick correction trial and test again. The whole package takes about an hour and gives you untaught, context-bound emotion responses that typical drills often miss.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one emotion, one person, and one place the child already knows; teach the three direct matches, then probe the untaught combination and record if they derive it.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of a set of procedures in evoking responding under multiple stimulus control (identifying emotions when provided a person and context) in a match-to-sample arrangement. Three participants with autism achieved a mastery criterion following direct training of the target relations, and two of the participants additionally demonstrated derived relations without direct training (identifying people when provided an emotion and context). Corrective procedures were effective in promoting the emergence of derived relations for the third participant. These data suggest that incorporating derived stimulus relation training and testing procedures may have utility for clinical interventions in children with autism.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s40617-019-00339-4