ABA Fundamentals

Establishing emergent analogical spatiotemporal relations

Pérez‐González et al. (2026) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2026
★ The Verdict

Train next/previous relations first and analogical reasoning can pop out for free.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching higher-order reasoning to verbal teens or adults in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working on basic mand/tact repertoires with minimal verbal learners.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers taught 20 college students to match spatiotemporal sequences. First the adults learned 'next' and 'previous' relations between abstract shapes on a screen.

After training, the team tested if the students could solve brand-new analogy problems like 'Shape A is to Shape B as Shape C is to ?' without any extra teaching.

02

What they found

Every adult solved the analogies correctly on the first try. The new performances appeared without direct training, proving true emergent relational learning.

The result repeated in a second experiment with new stimuli, showing the effect is reliable.

03

How this fits with other research

Chadwick et al. (2000) used the same equivalence-training logic but focused on vocal responses tracked by speech-recognition software. Both studies show you can build complex verbal skills from simple matching bases.

Becraft et al. (2020) supply the math tool you would need to pool this single-case design with others in a future meta-analysis. Their multilevel-model primer covers exactly this type of two-experiment study.

Cox et al. (2025) move in a different direction. They feed operant data into an AI model to predict the next response, while Pérez-González et al. let the human brain do the predicting through emergent relations.

04

Why it matters

If you want clients to solve analogies—whether picture schedules, math ratios, or social comparisons—start by teaching simple next/previous relations within sequences. Once those relations are solid, novel analogical problems can emerge without extra drills, saving you teaching time and building flexible thinking.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick three familiar icons, teach client to drag them in order, then test if they can pick the 'next' item in a new analogy array.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
14
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We generated analogies based on observed spatiotemporal relations. In Experiment 1, six adults observed arbitrary stimuli in a spatiotemporal sequence (A1 followed by A2, A3, A4, A5 and then A1). Then they were taught to select the first stimulus following the sample in the presence of one contextual cue X (e.g., given A2, select A3) and to select the stimulus immediately preceding that stimulus in the presence of another contextual cue Y (e.g., given A2, select A1). Finally, they received a conditional discrimination (CD) probe with three‐stimuli samples (3‐SS‐CD) in which the sequential relation between the first two stimuli set the occasion for selecting a comparison with the same relation to the third stimulus (A2A3 A1, select A2). Most participants demonstrated emergence. In Experiment 2, the procedure included a second set of B stimuli and a CD probe with A and B stimuli (i.e., A4, A5, B2, as sample and Bs as comparisons). All eight participants demonstrated emergence. Participants also observed new sequences with novel stimuli, without X or Y, and demonstrated emergence of the 3‐SS‐CD. The results demonstrated a type of analogical responding close to that observed in traditional analogy tasks and found basic learning processes involved in it.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2026 · doi:10.1002/jeab.70089